Laserfiche WebLink
Page 1 of 9 <br /> <br />LINO LAKES CITY COUNCIL <br />REGULAR MEETING <br />MINUTES <br /> <br />DATE: May 27, 2025 <br />TIME STARTED: 6:30 PM <br />TIME ENDED: 8:15 PM <br />LOCATION: City Council Chambers <br />MEMBERS PRESENT: Mayor Rafferty, Councilmembers Cavegn, Lyden, and <br />Stoesz <br />MEMBERS EXCUSED ABSENT: Councilmember Ruhland <br />Staff Members Present: Interim City Administrator Dave Pecchia, City Clerk Roberta Colotti, <br />Interim Finance Director Kelly Horn, Community Development Director Michael Grochala, City <br />Planner Katie Larsen, City Engineer Diane Hankee, Environmental Specialist Tom Hoffman, Chief <br />of Police Curt Boehme, and Fire Chief Dan L’Allier. <br />The meeting was called to order by Mayor Rafferty at 6:30 p.m. <br />Mayor Rafferty provided an overview of the Rules of Decorum. <br />PUBLIC COMMENT <br />Mayor Rafferty opened the public comment period at 6:33 p.m. <br /> <br />The City Clerk stated that Catherine Decker, 614 Pine Street, Lino Lakes submitted a letter for <br />public comment. This was in follow up to her May 12, 2025 letter regarding the Natures Refuge <br />North proposed development. Ms. Decker stated that she strongly opposed the re-zoning from <br />R-X to PUD and the grading approval that would pave the way for irreversible environmental and <br />community damage, without compromise, credibility or honest public engagement. Ms. Decker <br />referenced another letter submitted at the May 12th meeting by 18 nearby residents in <br />opposition to the project, noting that according to ICMA data that represents up to 1,800 silent <br />opponents. She reviewed the wildlife and natural resources within the project area. She stated <br />that the narrative that the development will be for those 55+, which would have a lower impact <br />on traffic, is false as there are not any legal restrictions to require buyers to be 55+. She stated <br />that there is still time to pivot to a better plan – one that doesn’t make Natures Refuge North <br />stick out like a sore thumb. A development that reflects its surroundings, not steamrolls them. <br />She stated that she had previously proposed this project include one-acre minimum lots, similar <br />to the neighborhoods on all sides. Alternatively, if the City is unwilling to amend the lot sizes, <br />then proceeding with Phase 1 only and abandoning Phase 2 would bring the overall density closer <br />to being in line with what residents have called for and would also abandon the connection to <br />Andall Street, resolving yet even more concerns. This would be a meaningful compromise that <br />could address many of the concerns raised by residents in Arena Acres, Nature’s Refuge, and Pine <br />Street alike. She concluded her letter by stated if resources truly aren’t a concern for this <br />development, then why is the city enforcing a water restriction starting May 15th. <br />Page 13 of 353