My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
07-28-25 City Council Meeting Agenda
LinoLakes
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2025
>
Searchable Packets
>
07-28-25 City Council Meeting Agenda
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2025 2:37:13 PM
Creation date
7/23/2025 2:35:18 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Council Document Type
Council Packet
Meeting Date
07/28/2025
Council Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
31
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
CITY COUNCIL <br />WORK SESSION STAFF REPORT <br />ITEM NO. C <br />STAFF ORIGINATOR: Michael Grochala, Community Development Director <br />WORK SESSION DATE: July 28, 2025 <br />TOPIC: Water Appropriation Permit Contested Case Appeal Update <br />BACKGROUND <br />On August 30, 2017, the Ramsey County District Court issued a judgement regarding the <br />groundwater management of White Bear Lake and the Prairie Du Chien -Jordan Aquifer. As a <br />result, the City's Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (DNR) Water Appropriation <br />Permit 1985-6168 was amended to include the following requirements: <br />• PREPARE A PLAN TO CONVERT TO SURFACE WATER SOURCE <br />EJEWL I_[ _T►1j] LtX@]:%l7_\ M'Jr �i�1_\�T:7:7[�1_�L•P►1=T_1►\�i9a�►\�i�l:I�ir 3 _17w_\:� <br />DROPS BELOW 923.5 <br />• PREPARE AN ENFORCEABLE PLAN TO LIMIT PER CAPITA WATER USE (75 GPD FOR <br />RESIDENTIAL AND 90 GPD TOTAL) <br />• REPORT ANNUALLY ON COLLABORATIVE EFFORTS WITH NE COMMUNITIES TO MEET <br />THE PER CAPITA REQUIREMENTS <br />The City, along with multiple other communities, appealed 3 of the 4 amendments and a <br />contested case hearing was held in 2023 before an Administrative Law Judge (ALJ). The ALJ <br />struck the irrigation ban requirement but left the other amendments in place. Both the White <br />Bear Lake Restoration Association and White Bear Lake Homeowners Association appealed the <br />decision. The 6 communities involved appealed as well. <br />In July the Minnesota Court of Appeals ruled on the appeals and reversed the decision of the <br />ALJ and remanded for further review. City Attorney, Jay Squires, is recommending that we ask <br />the Supreme Court to review the decision. Under the Rules any party to a Court of Appeals <br />matter can ask the Supreme Court to exercise its discretionary review power. The Supreme <br />Court does not have to do so. A request is in the form of a Petition for Review, which is a short <br />document highlighting the importance of the case. <br />1 <br />Page 3 of 31 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.