My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
08-04-25 - City Council Work Session Agenda
LinoLakes
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2025
>
Searchable Packets
>
08-04-25 - City Council Work Session Agenda
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/1/2025 12:23:11 PM
Creation date
8/1/2025 11:50:55 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Council Document Type
Council Packet
Meeting Date
08/04/2025
Council Meeting Type
Work Session Regular
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
617
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Date Submitted: 05/28/2025 <br />Name: James Bosak <br />Subject: Both Scenarios <br />Comment: Both scenarios appear to show an extension of 121st that would run along the north side of <br />my property at 7798 Sunset and connect to Robinson Drive. I cannot imagine what value such a road <br />might have since it essentially parallels Sunset. What it would do for me personally is completely destroy <br />the value of my property, at least to me. Please let me know as soon as possible if this is a serious <br />possibility so that I can start looking for another place to live. If that road is built neither of the scenarios <br />will make any difference to me since I would not be living in Lino Lakes anymore. <br />Address: 7798 SUNSET AVE, LINO LAKES, MN 55014, United States <br />Date Submitted: 06/03/2025 <br />Name: James Bosak <br />Subject: feedback <br />Comment: I am not sure what more feedback on this issue will achieve, guessing it's probably just a <br />mandatory part of the whole AUAR process and will not have any impact whatsoever on what is <br />eventually allowed to go forward. I would hope that by now the wishes of the residents living in close <br />proximity to the proposed development area are fairly well known, i.e. "Slow the Grow". Simply put <br />those wishes are; the lowest possible housing density and the highest possible green natural space <br />possible. At 3400 or 3500 units neither of the scenarios presented come close to achieving this, at least in <br />my view. Dividing the 962 acres by 3450 units gives about only .28 acres per unit. But it is really even <br />lower than this since at significant portion of the 962 acres are already fully developed (not sure why they <br />were even included in the study). I would be interested to know what the process and criteria were that <br />determined what the appropriate density should be. If this was explained in the AUAR report I must have <br />missed it. There must have been some consistent considerations since both scenarios come up with <br />almost the same overall density. In order for the density proposed to be achieved it looks to me like it will <br />be at a very high cost since according to the map presented in the AUAR about half of the acres are in the <br />FEMA flood zones. An awful lot of dirt will have to be moved around. Oh well, I'm sure some <br />developer will be allowed to give it a try, hopefully not one convicted of theft by swindle. For what it's <br />worth, between the two scenarios presented, this resident votes for scenario 1. <br />Address: 7798 SUNSET AVE, LINO LAKES, MN 55014, United States <br />Page 572 of 617 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.