My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
08-11-25 - City Council Agenda
LinoLakes
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2025
>
Searchable Packets
>
08-11-25 - City Council Agenda
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/12/2025 8:42:09 AM
Creation date
8/12/2025 8:25:47 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Council Document Type
Council Packet
Meeting Date
08/11/2025
Council Meeting Type
Regular
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
679
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Northwest Main – Lino Lakes, MN <br />Traffic Impact Analysis │ June 2025 <br />2 <br /> <br />1. INTRODUCTION <br />Kimley-Horn was retained to prepare a Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) for the Northwest Main Street <br />development in Lino Lakes, Minnesota, as the site undergoes the Alternative Urban Areawide Review <br />(AUAR) process. The site is located along Main Street (on both sides of the street) between the city limits <br />and 4th Avenue. An aerial view of the study location and surrounding roadway network is presented in <br />Exhibit 1. <br />As part of this study, the existing roadway network was analyzed to determine the current operations at the <br />study intersections. In order to assess the potential impact of the development scenarios on the area <br />roadway network, site-generated trips were established and added to the background traffic volumes. <br />Background traffic volumes included the other major development projects in the vicinity. Future traffic <br />conditions were evaluated for the approximate Opening Year of the proposed development (2030) and a <br />long-term “Design Year” (2045). Background conditions were analyzed for each study year, along with the <br />“build” conditions of the two development scenarios. Additionally, an Existing (2025) conditions traffic <br />analysis was conducted. <br />This report presents and documents data collection, summarizes the evaluation of existing and projected <br />future traffic conditions on the surrounding roadways, and identifies recommendations to address the <br />potential impact of site-generated traffic on the adjacent roadway network. <br />1.1. REPORT PURPOSE AND OBJECTIVES <br />The purpose of this study is to address traffic and transportation impacts of the proposed development on <br />surrounding streets and intersections. This traffic impact study was prepared based on criteria set forth by <br />the AUAR guidelines. The following specific information, per AUAR recommended content, should be <br />provided: <br />• A description and map of the existing and proposed roadway system, including state, regional, and <br />local roads to be affected by the development of the AUAR area. This information should include <br />existing and proposed roadway capacities and existing and projected background (i.e. without the <br />AUAR development) traffic volumes; <br />• Trip generation data – trip generation rates and trip totals – for each major development scenario <br />broken down by land use zones and/or other relevant subdivisions of the area. The projected <br />distributions onto the roadway system must be included; <br />• Analysis of impacts of the traffic generated by the AUAR area on the roadway system, including: <br />comparison of peak period total flows to capacities and analysis of Level of Service and delay times <br />at critical points (if any); <br />• A discussion of structural and non-structural improvements and traffic management measures that <br />are proposed to mitigate problems. <br />Note: in the above analyses the geographical scope must extend outward as far as the traffic to be <br />generated would have a significant effect on the roadway system and traffic measurements and projections <br />should include peak days and peak hours, or other appropriate measures related to identifying congestion <br />problems, as well as ADTs (average daily traffic). <br />Page 183 of 679
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.