Laserfiche WebLink
Ms. Katie Larsen <br />09/03/2025 <br />Page 3 <br />8.WSB Response (9/3/25) – Block 1 lot elevations must maintain 2’ of freeboard to <br />the pond 100-yr HWL of 905.55. Lots 1 and 2 do not have sufficient vertical <br />separation with basement elevations of 907.0 and 907.5. <br />9.Provide additional easement for utilities outside the right of way <br />a.Easements need to meet a 1:1 slope with the invert of the utility with a <br />minimum of 20' centered on the easement <br />10.Swales should be shown to occur along side property lines <br />•Stormwater Management <br />Stormwater management for the Erickson Property site consists of a sedimentation basin to <br />provide treatment. Existing and proposed discharge rates are summarized below. <br />Pre- and Post- Development Discharge Rates (cfs) <br />Condition2-Year10-Year100-Year10-Day Snowmelt <br />Only needed if <br />Existing9.6415.2332.09 <br />basins landlocked <br />Currently Only needed if <br />4.316.4612.40 <br />Proposedbasins landlocked <br />Comments: <br />1.This development falls within the Northeast Drainage Area Comprehensive <br />Stormwater Management Plan (CSMP) area and as such is beholden to additional <br />rate control and volume reduction requirements. <br />Landform Response (8/11/25) – Proposed outlet structure has been re-routed to the <br />existing south pond (Pond 500). See updated plans & stormwater report. <br />2.The pond south of this development was constructed with the Watermark <br />development and designed to include runoff from the Erickson Property. If rates are <br />reduced or maintained from existing conditions, volume control provided in the form <br />of stormwater reuse, and water quality treatment provided by the proposed pond, it is <br />recommended to overflow the onsite pond south to the existing Pond 500 (NWL 899, <br />HWL 904.3). This allows the proposed development to meet CSMP rate control <br />requirements by utilizing the existing Watermark system that already meets <br />requirements. <br />Landform Response (8/11/25) – Proposed outlet structure has been re-routed to the <br />existing south pond (Pond 500). See updated plans & stormwater report. <br />3.Why does PB-3 have water surface land cover modeled in HydroCAD? <br />Landform Response (8/11/25) – This should have been Type D soils. Updated. <br />4.The pond EOF must include riprap stabilization. <br />Landform Response (8/11/25) – Updated. See Plans. <br />5.The modeled pond EOF of 906.5 does not reflect the EOF of 905.57 in the plans. <br />Landform Response (8/11/25) – Model has been updated with an EOF of 905.57. <br />6.A detail must be provided for the pond outlet control structure. <br />Landform Response (8/11/25) – Plan and profiles have been included. <br />WSB Response (9/3/25) – The pond skimmer structure must include the rim <br />elevation and must match the grate modeled in HydroCAD. The submerged 12” pipe <br />Erickson Property Development - Engineering Review <br /> <br />