My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
09/10/2025 PZ Combined Packet
LinoLakes
>
Advisory Boards & Commissions
>
Planning & Zoning Board
>
Packets
>
2025
>
09/10/2025 PZ Combined Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/5/2025 3:04:44 PM
Creation date
9/5/2025 3:04:35 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
P&Z
P&Z Document Type
P&Z Packet
Meeting Date
09/10/2025
P&Z Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
98
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Environmental Memo <br />To:Katie Larsen, City Planner <br />From:Tom Hoffman, Environmental CoordinatorTom Hoffman, Environmental Coordinator <br />Date:September 3, 2025 <br />Re: Environmental Comments – Erickson Properties Preliminary Plat/Hampton Addition <br />Final Plat <br />Environmental Board recommended the following at their May 28, 2025 meeting: <br />1.Stormwater management to be reviewed by City Engineer <br />a.Use of stormwater for irrigation purposes for the site should be evaluated <br />and if feasible required as part of site development. Larger stormwater <br />ponds constructed for fill should be evaluated for water reuse. <br />b.Infiltration is required to be shown where feasible based on soil borings. <br />If infiltration is not feasible follow the Minimum impact design standards <br />(MIDS)) as designed by the MPCA <br />2.EOF should be shown as stabilized rock to prevent erosion of the stormwater pond. <br />a.Trail should have rip rap or rock shouldering to prevent washout and <br />undermining of the trail <br />3.Low maintenance turf should be evaluated throughout development. Ground covers <br />should be drought resistant to reduce the need for irrigation use. <br />4. Provide a tree inventory for the site showing only significant deciduous trees of 6” in <br /> dbh or larger. Coniferous trees are measured by height, coniferous trees over 12’ would <br />be considered significant. <br />a.Coniferous trees should be measured by height not DBH. <br />b.Remove off-site trees from the final tree inventory <br />c.Mitigation table provided for trees outside of basic use. <br />5.On section 4.1, bold or change the color of the tree tags to be visible. <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.