Laserfiche WebLink
Ms. Katie Larsen <br />08/06/2025 <br />Page 4 <br />Nature Refuge North Addition Engineering Review <br />WSB (5/23/2025) Complete <br /> <br />5. Per new RCWD standards, any new impervious flowing to a pond designed in <br />accordance with NURP criteria counts as full water quality treatment, therefore the <br />full volume credit can be claimed for new impervious flowing to Pond 500 and 600 if <br />properly designed. <br />Carlson (4/25/2025) Water quality revised. <br />WSB (5/23/2025) Complete <br /> <br />6. Pond 300 should be renamed to Lake 300 as its depth is well in excess of the 10’ <br />max depth outlined in NURP criteria. Additionally, it cannot be counted as providing <br />water quality treatment. <br />Carlson (4/25/2025) Note has been revised. <br />WSB (5/23/2025) Complete <br /> <br />7. Please clarify why drainage area 26S is modeled. It is offsite and has no change from <br />existing to proposed conditions. <br />Carlson (4/25/2025) 26S was modeled assuming the Street B connection to Andall <br />may occur. We are assuming the new street will have ribbon curb and there will be <br />no drainage increase to 26 (for now). <br />WSB (5/23/2025) Noted. <br /> <br />8. The 2.5” event should be modeled in HydroCAD to determine runoff volumes needed <br />for pond dead storage. <br />Carlson (4/25/2025) The 2.5” event is calculated within our pond spreadsheet which <br />gives us our required dead storage through calculations within this spreadsheet. <br />WSB (5/23/2025) Noted, though per Comment 3 above, these calculations need to <br />be updated. <br />Carlson (6/6/2025) Revised. <br />WSB (6/25/2025) Complete <br /> <br />9. As many wetlands receiving runoff are Type 1, they are classified as highly <br />susceptible and therefore must have no increase in bounce or inundation period for <br />the 2- and 10-year events. <br />Carlson (4/25/2025) Kjolhaug environmental reviewed the wetland susceptibility and <br />all wetlands were adjusted. No wetlands are considered highly susceptible. <br />WSB (5/23/2025) Complete <br /> <br />10. Detailed storm sewer plans, profiles, and calculations will be needed in future <br />submittals. This should include all utility crossings to confirm constructability and any <br />need for insulation. It should also include structure type and sizing to confirm <br />constructability with pipe alignments. It is likely that more storm sewer design <br />comments will be generated at that time. <br />a. The pipe run from FES to 503 as shown has a velocity under the minimum of <br />3 ft/s. <br />Carlson (4/25/2025) The plan and profiles will be provided with final plans. Design <br />spreadsheet and structure map provided until final plans are made. <br />WSB (5/23/2025) Noted. This submittal does not include a profile view of utilities. To <br />be completed <br /> <br />11. All proposed storm sewer serving public roads must be a minimum 15” diameter and <br />consist of RCP. <br />Carlson (4/25/2025) Noted. <br />Page 110 of 168