My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
01/03/2012 Council Packet
LinoLakes
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
1982-2020
>
2012
>
01/03/2012 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/29/2014 12:16:12 PM
Creation date
1/6/2014 11:40:07 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Council Document Type
Council Packet
Meeting Date
01/03/2012
Council Meeting Type
Work Session Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
61
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
The Fiscal Disparities Program: Commercial - Industrial Tax Base Sharing - House Research Page 2 of 2 <br />Calculating the property tax for each commercial - industrial property. The property <br />tax statement for each 0/1 property has a local portion and an areawide portion, based <br />on the relative amount of the tax base that is contributed (areawide portion) versus the <br />relative amount that is retained (local portion) for the municipality where the property is <br />located. <br />How has the In the first year of implementation (1975), the areawide tax base included 6.7 percent of <br />metropolitan area the total metro C/1 tax base and 2.1 percent of the total metro tax base. For 2004, the <br />program grown? areawide tax base was 32.3 percent of the total metro 0/1 base and 9.8 percent of the <br />total metro tax base. <br />How much do fiscal A House Research study based on taxes payable in 2004 found that the average <br />disparities affect tax homestead tax in St. Paul, which is one of the largest net beneficiaries of the program, <br />burdens? was 8.8 percent lower because of fiscal disparities. The study also found that the <br />average homestead tax in Bloomington, which is one of the largest net contributors, was <br />5.5 percent higher. Homestead effects throughout the area generally varied between <br />these extremes. <br />For commercial - industrial properties, average taxes were 2.7 percent lower in St. Paul <br />due to fiscal disparities and 9.7 percent higher in Plymouth, another suburban city that is <br />a large net contributor. Commercial - industrial properties elsewhere in the metro area fall <br />in line between these extremes. <br />The study looked only at the direct effect of fiscal disparities, i.e., the redistribution of tax <br />base, and made no attempt to factor in alternative development patterns that might have <br />occurred without fiscal disparities. <br />How did the 2001 The elimination of the general education levy, imposition of a state property tax levy, and <br />property tax reform reduction in commercial - industrial class rates caused the nominal amount of money <br />affect fiscal redistributed by the fiscal disparities program to decrease. However, based on the <br />disparities? aforementioned House Research study, the net effect of fiscal disparities on tax burdens <br />is similar to what it was before the reform. <br />What about the Iron Tax effects of the Iron Range fiscal disparities program are much smaller in magnitude <br />Range program? since the percentage of tax base being contributed is so low due to the relative infancy <br />of the program. <br />For more information: Contact legislative analyst Steve Hinze at 651- 296 -8956 or Karen Baker at 651- 296 -8959. Also <br />see the House Research publication Minnesota's Fiscal Disparities Programs: Twin Cities Area and Iron Range. <br />January 2005 <br />Return to Property Tax <br />Return to House Research home <br />Updated on <br />http: / /www.house.leg. state .mn.us /hrd/pubs /ss /ssfisdis.htm 12/13/2011 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.