My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
12/10/2025 PZ Combined Packet
LinoLakes
>
Advisory Boards & Commissions
>
Planning & Zoning Board
>
Packets
>
2025
>
12/10/2025 PZ Combined Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/11/2025 12:14:31 PM
Creation date
12/11/2025 12:14:16 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
P&Z
P&Z Document Type
P&Z Packet
Meeting Date
12/10/2025
P&Z Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
125
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Planning & Zoning Board <br />November 12, 2025 <br />Page 4 <br />The public hearing was closed at 7:11 p.m. Moved by Evenson, seconded by Vojtech. <br />Mr. Root addressed the drainage issues in the northwest quadrant. Mr. Grochala stated <br />that the drainage goes through 10-22-32, built to drain agricultural land. When <br />development happens, the drainage will be addressed. The watershed district currently <br />does not have concerns about that area. The City is having conversations with the <br />watershed district. <br />Mr. Root wanted to address the density concerns, how new development impacts taxes, <br />and public transportation. Mr. Grochala stated we did not change the density to the <br />area with the master plan, rather just moved the density around, like moving the high <br />density towards the border with Blaine. Mr. Grochala stated that we do not have the <br />density to justify having public transit. Mr. Grochala explained that there is not an <br />economic study done with each development regarding taxes. Mr. Grochala stated that <br />rooftops generate commercial coming in and would generate revenue. Mr. Grochala <br />stated that having a diverse tax base would make it so that we do not rely on one tax <br />base. The City does not go out and look for developers; we have statutes to meet <br />through the state. The City cannot dictate what is built, only that the proposals that <br />come in meet City requirements set by the City Council. <br />Mr. Root asked what would happen if the City were to opt out of the Metropolitan <br />Council. Mr. Grochala stated Ham Lake does not have sanitary sewer. Lino Lakes has <br />sanitary sewer which services our commercial and industrial districts. The City is <br />required to be in conformance with the Metropolitan Council since we do utilize <br />sanitary sewer. <br />Mr. Root wanted to address the phase changes, specifically the utility phasing. Mr. <br />Grochala stated that only one property was changed into a different phasing district. <br />This is not to say that it cannot change moving forward. Mr. Root wanted to know what <br />property owners that want their utility staging to be moved up can do. Mr. Grochala <br />stated that property owners who want to be moved up need to speak with the City. <br />Mr. Wipperfurth wanted to address the watershed district issues and what the City can <br />do. Mr. Grochala stated the City has reached out to the watershed district, and that the <br />watershed district has stated they do not see an issue. The City is having additional <br />meetings with the watershed district and additional studies are being considered. The <br />City is replacing the Andall Street culvert. Mr. Grochala stated that ditch law is <br />complicated and is created by the state. Mr. Wipperfurth wondered if the watershed is <br />waiting for development before addressing issues in the area. <br />DRAFT MINUTES <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.