Laserfiche WebLink
• <br />• <br />COUNCIL MINUTES <br />May 14, 2012 P22 <br />DRAFT <br />90 city has looked at the streets proposed, more review indicated the streets in the Pheasant Hills <br />91 neighborhood would not benefit from sealcoating. Those streets were pulled off and replaced with <br />92 the next streets on the list. The proposed list is approximately 12 miles at a cost of about $316,000, <br />93 somewhat over the budget planned for sealcoating this year but proposed to be handled with overage <br />94 funds that have accumulated. The cost will be clarified once bids are received and a fmal low bid <br />95 accepted. <br />96 <br />97 The council discussed with staff the possibility that other streets are in the same condition as Pheasant <br />98 Hills and how that will be addressed for pavement treatment. The council also asked that staff add <br />99 the plans for future roadwork on the Website. <br />100 <br />101 Council Member O'Donnell moved to approve Resolution No. 12 -36, as presented. Council Member <br />102 Roeser seconded the motion. Motion carried on a unanimous voice vote. <br />103 <br />104 6B) Resolution No. 12 -37, Approving Plans and Specifications and Authorizing Advertisement <br />105 for Bids for the 2012 Street Overlay Project — City Engineer Wedel explained that the city also <br />106 implements a street overlay program each year based on the city's Pavement Management Plan. This <br />107 year's project is Leonard Avenue and Bradley Street, originally planned for mill and overlay. Now, <br />108 after more review of the street, it has been determined that a reclamation project is more appropriate. <br />109 The reclamation involves pulling up the street, grinding that product down, and reusing that product <br />110 to pave the street. The cost of the project is fully included in the existing budget. The council <br />111 confirmed that the residents on that street will be well informed and issues minimized during any <br />112 construction period. <br />113 <br />114 Council Member Roeser moved to approve Resolution No. 12 -37 as presented. Council Member <br />115 Stoesz seconded the motion. Motion carried on a unanimous voice vote. <br />116 <br />117 6C) Resolution No. 12 -42, Approving Amendment to the I -35W /CSAH 14 Joint Powers <br />118 Agreement with Anoka County regarding Lilac Street Improvements — City Engineer Wedel <br />119 reported that staff is proposing an amendment to the city's joint powers agreement with Anoka <br />120 County relative to Lilac Street. The city has authorized that Lilac Street be included in Anoka <br />121 County's reclamation program, at the city's cost but with savings due to being a part of a larger <br />122 program. The funds are available mainly through funds given to the city from the county when Lilac <br />123 Street was taken back from them. <br />124 <br />125 Council Member Rafferty moved to approve Resolution No. 12 -42 as presented. Council Member <br />126 Roeser seconded the motion. Motion carried on a unanimous voice vote. <br />127 <br />128 6D) Resolution No. 12 -41, Approving a Municipal State Aid (MSA) Funding Advance, <br />129 I35W/Lake Drive and I35E /CSAH 14 Interchange Improvements — City Engineer Wedel <br />130 explained the request for an MSA advance. The request is based on communication from the <br />131 Minnesota Department of Transportation indicating advance of funds would be appropriate and to <br />132 make funds on hand for cities to utilize. The city's MSA funds for the future are mainly devoted to <br />133 payment for improvements to interchange projects in the city. <br />134 <br />