My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
06/11/2012 Council Packet
LinoLakes
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
1982-2020
>
2012
>
06/11/2012 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/29/2014 2:08:38 PM
Creation date
1/9/2014 11:08:15 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Council Document Type
Council Packet
Meeting Date
06/11/2012
Council Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
50
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• <br />• <br />• <br />CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION May 21, 2012 <br />DRAFT <br />83 fully understand a gap. The council discussed the perspective of not focusing on a levy <br />84 number but rather on needs and the cost of those needs. Administrator Karlson noted <br />85 that the council will want to see revenues and expenditures and work with the budget <br />86 from there. The mayor suggested that a direction to staff is to show the council how they <br />87 can maintain the same level of services to residents as in 2012; he'd like to see if there are <br />88 any services that are beim, provided that are obsolete. Council Member Stoesz added that <br />89 he'd like to receive a graph that indicates who (residents) benefits from what elements of <br />90 the city budget. <br />91 The council discussed possible savings in the snow plowing budget and heard that the <br />92 spending of those funds isn't final until the end of the year. When asked if forfeiture <br />93 funds will be available, Chief Swenson explained that use of those funds is strictly <br />94 controlled under law. Suggestions from Council Member Roeser: consider new revenue <br />95 from newly built homes in the city, leasing of equipment to other jurisdictions, <br />96 outsourcing if called for by wage increases, and health care alternatives. <br />97 Council Member Rafferty asked for a breakdown of the 13.75 positions, how and where <br />98 did they go. He would also like to see information on best practice on how long to keep <br />99 equipment. <br />100 Council and staff discussed the unpredictable variables such as a tax cap. The variables <br />101 have to be considered as much as possible in case they do happen. <br />102 Administrator Karlson noted that staff is still looking for efficiencies and will present a <br />103 preliminary budget in late July. Council Member Rafferty suggested that he'd like to <br />104 have information as early as possible because the more review the council can do, the <br />105 better informed the decisions. <br />106 Council Member Stoesz added that he is interested in increasing the IT efficiency of the <br />107 city, such as by providing more city information and forms on -line. He suggests that <br />108 resident visits to city hall be logged so as to determine the best way to provide those <br />109 services they need on -line. Administrator Karlson pointed out that there are some IT <br />110 projects underway right now that are demanding much time so it may be difficult to <br />111 engage new IT efforts now. Specifically the document imaging conversion project will <br />112 be a huge efficiency but since the project is being undertaken without outside assistance, <br />113 it is challenging. The mayor added that the council needs to hear about challenges to <br />114 projects; the council supports greater improvement and efficiencies but understands the <br />115 stress of more work with less employees. <br />116 Council Member Roeser suggested that interns (paid or otherwise) may be a good <br />117 resource for the city right now. He also noted that the city should be seeing some energy <br />118 savings through recent retrofits. <br />119 The council concurred that they would continue the discussion at a special work session <br />120 on June 25, 2012 after the regular council meeting. <br />121 <br />122 The meeting was adjourned at 7:52 p.m. <br />123 <br />3 <br />P23 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.