My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
06/25/2012 Council Packet
LinoLakes
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
1982-2020
>
2012
>
06/25/2012 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/29/2014 2:19:08 PM
Creation date
1/9/2014 12:07:57 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Council Document Type
Council Packet
Meeting Date
06/25/2012
Council Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
157
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
P13 <br />CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION June 4, 2012 <br />DRAFT <br />45 The council discussed street access and emergency vehicle access; it may make more <br />46 sense to consider a through street rather than a cul -de -sac. <br />47 <br />48 When Council Member O'Donnell asked about next steps, Mr. Grochala noted that the <br />49 staff report explains the city process. The developer would normally engage an engineer <br />50 for formal planning. If a development team were put together, he would suggest they <br />51 meet with city staff. Mr. DeHaven expressed concern about the escrow system and city <br />52 charges that are incurred through that process. <br />53 <br />54 When Council Member Roeser asked if there may be some funding available on a <br />55 regional level for a development like this, Mr. Grochala explained that he wouldn't see <br />56 anything available for something on this scale. <br />57 <br />58 Not relative to the housing development discussion, Public Services Director DeGardner <br />59 remarked that the garden club that includes Mrs. DeHaven has done a wonderful job with <br />60 the landscaping work outside of city hall. The council expressed their extreme <br />61 satisfaction with the result of the landscaping and noted that they will formally recognize <br />62 the volunteers at an upcoming council meeting. <br />63 <br />64 Water System Discussion (added agenda item) — Public Services Director DeGardner <br />65 noted that a "Don't Drink the Water" advisory was issued for the City of Lino Lakes this <br />66 day and he introduced the city's Utility Supervisor Tim Hillesheim to further explain that <br />67 situation. <br />68 <br />69 Mr. Hillesheim explained that this morning at about 3:30 or 4:00 a.m. the SCADA <br />70 computer system for the city's water system locked up during a routine data backup - <br />71 why that program locked has not yet been determined but is being studied. That means <br />72 that communication with the wells ceased and pressure started going down. This is <br />73 irrigation season so it went down pretty fast. There is a redundant dialing system that <br />74 then failed. He was notified by the Police Department at about 4:30 or 5:00 a.m. of the <br />75 pressure problem and that they were in the process of manually turning on the pumps. <br />76 Mr. Hillesheim arrived on the scene by 5:30 a.m. and can report that by 6:00 a.m. the <br />77 wells were fully pressurized. At no time did the wells run into a negative pressure <br />78 situation, which is what the Health Department worries about. The Health Department <br />79 felt that the potential did exist for that negative pressure and the result is that they issued <br />80 the advisory. They are testing the water in the system and he is very confident there will <br />81 be no problem. Additional steps that could be taken to avoid the problem in the future <br />82 would be to have Roseville (our IT partners) monitor our SCADA system at all hours of <br />83 the day (as they do for a couple of other cities), and/or to install pressure transducers as <br />84 another fail safe. <br />85 <br />86 Council Member Roeser asked if the Health Department had known that there was never <br />87 a negative pressure, would they still have initiated the advisory? Mr. Hillesheim said no <br />88 and Mr. DeGardner added that there will be some follow up conversations with the <br />89 Health Department to ensure that proper protocol has been followed and to develop full <br />2 <br />• <br />• <br />• <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.