My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
07/09/2012 Council Packet
LinoLakes
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
1982-2020
>
2012
>
07/09/2012 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/29/2014 2:44:28 PM
Creation date
1/10/2014 8:32:23 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Council Document Type
Council Packet
Meeting Date
07/09/2012
Council Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
195
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
P40 <br />EXHIBIT B- Revised <br />The Six Cities have concluded that use of traditional sand /salt mixtures should be <br />discontinued in favor of a more comprehensive approach to safe winter roads. Some <br />reasons for the decision are in the following information. <br />"Use of sand (abrasives) <br />An old and widely used practice is spreading abrasives, such as sand or <br />cinders, on the roadway. Although abrasives supply some traction for traffic, <br />contain no chlorides, and are more visible than salt, they have many <br />drawbacks: <br />1. Abrasives do not break the bond between pavement and ice. <br />2. They can be covered up or mixed with snow and become useless. <br />3. They can reduce traction on road surfaces after the snow and ice are gone. <br />4. They can chip paint and pit windshields. <br />5. They can clog drains and smother roadside vegetation. <br />6. They may require costly cleanup efforts after a storm or storm season." <br />(Salt Institute, 1985) <br />"Further, a mix of abrasives and chemical will usually be no more effective as <br />an anti -icing treatment during snowstorms than the same amount of chemical <br />placed alone. It even appears that the use of abrasives in the mix can be <br />detrimental to the effectiveness of the chemical. Because of the cost <br />associated with both application and clean -up of roads and drainage facilities, <br />and because of the potential airborne dust problem accompanying their use, <br />abrasives applications should not be a routine operation of an anti -icing <br />program." * *Manual of Practice for an Effective Anti -icing Program, MHWA <br />Snow and ice - covered roadways that have been treated with abrasives provide <br />friction values that are far less than "bare" or "wet" pavement (NCHRP, page 25). <br />Use of salt /abrasives mixes at moderately or much higher application rates <br />than straight chemical, does not lead to corresponding improvements in hard - <br />braking friction or pavement conditions. Comparisons of test and control <br />operations using identical salt /abrasives mixes show that more frequent <br />applications at similar rates also do not lead to corresponding improvements <br />in friction or pavement conditions and even indicate that the more frequent <br />applications can lead to slightly worse conditions (FHWA 1998, Section 7.4.1 on page <br />208 of the PDF). <br />The Five Cities plan to implement the Minnesota Department of Transportation Field <br />Handbook for Snowplow Operators for Snow and Ice Control. Included in the manual <br />are recommendations for anti -icing and guidelines for use of salt for deicing. The <br />difficulty of transitioning to anti -icing is the cost of equipment needed. That is where the <br />grant funding comes into play. <br />• <br />• <br />• <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.