My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
09/24/2012 Council Packet
LinoLakes
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
1982-2020
>
2012
>
09/24/2012 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/29/2014 3:50:17 PM
Creation date
1/13/2014 12:40:41 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Council Document Type
Council Packet
Meeting Date
09/24/2012
Council Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
70
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Kennedy <br />raven <br />CHARTERED <br />470 US Bank Plaza <br />200 South Sixth Street <br />Minneapolis MN 55402 <br />(612) 337 -9300 telephone <br />(612) 337 -9310 fax <br />http://www.kennedy-graven.com <br />MEMORANDUM <br />TO: Mary Alice Divine <br />Al Rolek <br />FROM: Stephen Bubul <br />DATE: September 21, 2012 <br />RE: Tax - Forfeited Property /Legacy at Woods Edge <br />You asked me to comment on the proposal made by Anoka County regarding the tax - <br />forfeited Legacy at Woods Edge property (which I will refer to as the "Property "). <br />As I understand the facts, County staff has offered to advance the City's second -half total <br />property tax settlement (which would normally be distributed in November), and the City <br />may then use those funds to purchase the Property at the fair market value price <br />determined by the County (which I understand is approximately $4,600,000). As <br />provided by State law, the County would deduct from that amount certain administrative <br />costs of the County, and the balance is returned to the City for application towards the <br />outstanding special assessments against the Property. The County advises that this <br />proposal would allow the City to take title to property, but receive the purchase price <br />back, which results in only a minimal cost to the City (i.e., the County administrative <br />costs). <br />While this proposal appears attractive at first glance, I don't believe it would accomplish <br />the intended purpose. When the net purchase price is returned to the City to pay the <br />outstanding special assessments, those dollars must be deposited in the debt service fund <br />the City's outstanding $5,500,000 Taxable General Obligation Improvement Bonds, <br />Series 2005A (the "Series 2005A Bonds "). In the resolution awarding sale of the Series <br />2005A Bonds, the City irrevocably pledged all special assessments levied against the <br />Property to payment of the Bonds, and the City would breach its covenant with <br />bondholders if those funds were diverted to some other purpose. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.