My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
10/01/2012 Council Packet
LinoLakes
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
1982-2020
>
2012
>
10/01/2012 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/29/2014 3:51:49 PM
Creation date
1/14/2014 9:01:21 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Council Document Type
Council Packet
Meeting Date
10/01/2012
Council Meeting Type
Work Session Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
20
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
WS — Item 2 <br />WORK SESSION STAFF REPORT <br />Work Session Item No. 2 <br />Date: October 1, 2012 <br />To: City Council <br />From: Michael Grochala, Joseph J. Langel <br />Re: Otter Lake Cartway <br />Background <br />The City Council held a public hearing on July 9, 2012, to consider a petition from Mr. Adam <br />Johnson, 2055 Otter Lake Drive, to establish a cartway to provide access to a landlocked parcel <br />he owns. At the work session on September 10, 2012, the Council requested additional <br />information from the parties, which was subsequently received. The following outlines the <br />factors for creating a cartway and provides some guidance on damages if a cartway is <br />established. <br />Establishing a Cartway <br />In order for a petitioner's request for a cartway to be approved, the following statutory factors <br />must be satisfied: <br />1.) Own a tract of land containing at least five acres. <br />There is no question that the subject property satisfies the acreage requirement. <br />2.) No access except over a navigable waterway or over the lands of others, or the <br />existing access is less than 33 feet in width. <br />The subject property is bordered by the lands of others on three sides and by the <br />Otter Lake channel on the west side. The channel is a navigable waterway as that <br />term is used in this context. <br />The Homeowner's Association ( "HOA ") now argues that Mr. Johnson can access <br />the subject property via his own bridge, which they assert does not constitute <br />"access by navigable waterway," so a cartway is not required. This argument is <br />without merit. <br />The statute requires the establishment of a cartway if there is no access "except <br />over a navigable waterway or over the lands of others..." Minn. Stat § 435.37, <br />subd. 1(a). This means that if a property owner has to cross a navigable waterway <br />in some fashion, then he does not have adequate access and a cartway is to be <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.