My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
10/08/2012 Council Packet
LinoLakes
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
1982-2020
>
2012
>
10/08/2012 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/29/2014 3:57:15 PM
Creation date
1/14/2014 9:13:54 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Council Document Type
Council Packet
Meeting Date
10/08/2012
Council Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
100
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• <br />• <br />• <br />Land Value <br />The HOA's appraiser values Outlot A at $.50 per square foot. Using the entire width and <br />length of the Outlot, which is calculated as 131,304 square feet, the estimated value of the entire <br />Outlot is $65,652. The HOA takes this number and simply adds it to their damage calculation. <br />A few issues come to mind with this approach. <br />First, the $.50 per square foot amount was calculated using the sales comparison <br />approach. The properties used as comparable sales appear to all be home lots, whereas Outlot A <br />is an outlot platted for the specific purpose of being used as a road. Roadway outlots and single - <br />family home sites are not terribly comparable. Such outlots are jointly owned whether directly <br />or through a homeowners association by those who use it. It is essentially a servient parcel that <br />benefits only those owners. As a dead -end private right -of -way, it is of no value to the general <br />public and would never be sold to anyone else. Consequently, the value derived by using <br />wooded, single family home sites as comparables is likely inflated. <br />Second, the HOA's damage number is calculated using the entire length and width of <br />Outlot A. The cartway sought, however, is the road width (which happens to be two rods wide — <br />the cartway minimum) and just enough length to get to the point of entry for the subject property. <br />This amounts to 16,121 square feet, or only 12.28% of the total. Staff is unaware of any <br />legitimate justifications for establishing a cartway wider or longer than Petitioner requested. <br />Third, the appraisal calculated the land at sale value. While that approach is commonly <br />used, for example, when more frontage is acquired from a property owner to widen a street or <br />land is acquired to build a new street as part of a neighboring development project, it may not <br />make sense when establishing a cartway over an existing road. Unlike in the typical situation, <br />this land is already expressly dedicated for, and is used as, a roadway. In fact, that is the reason <br />Outlot A was created in the first place. The land is therefore not being connected in the same <br />manner as in a typical road project. The use is not changing at all; it was a road before and still <br />will be if a cartway is established. <br />What is being created, in essence, is a license to access a portion of a private road without <br />any of the restrictions that can accompany a license. This is arguably a lesser impact to the <br />existing rights of the HOA and, consequently, it gives rise to lesser damages than the typical <br />creation of a new right -of -way easement. Thus, even if one only looks at the 16,121 square feet <br />sought by Petitioner, the full sale value of $.50 per square foot (or whatever it ought to be) may <br />be overstated. It is not as if the HOA will lose its use of the road. Rather, they will simply have <br />to share it with another person and his guests. There is a value to that loss of privacy, but it may <br />be less than the full sale value of $.50 per square foot. <br />Improvements <br />The HOA appraiser valued the roadway and bridge at $519,080. The Petitioner only <br />seeks access across the bridge to his property. Adding the bridge value ($273,700) to 12.28% of <br />the roadway, lighting and signage value ($30,133) equals $303,833. This is the estimated total <br />value. As discussed above, these improvements are not being taken in total for this cartway. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.