My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
10/08/2012 Council Packet
LinoLakes
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
1982-2020
>
2012
>
10/08/2012 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/29/2014 3:57:15 PM
Creation date
1/14/2014 9:13:54 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Council Document Type
Council Packet
Meeting Date
10/08/2012
Council Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
100
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• <br />• <br />Peninsula and is owned by the Oak Brook Peninsula Homeowners Association (the <br />"HOA "). <br />6. The private drive can serve as the cartway for purposes of accessing the Land. <br />7. It is reasonable to utilize the existing paved portion (which is two rods wide) of the <br />private drive for the cartway, beginning at the eastern terminus of Otter Lake Drive and <br />extending eastward as shown on the survey attached hereto as Exhibit B. In addition, to <br />provide reasonable access from the north edge of the existing paved drive north to the <br />southern boundary of the Land, the cartway is to include a portion of Outlot A 33 feet in <br />width as shown on Exhibit B. <br />8. The City has incurred costs and expenses in connection with these cartway proceedings. <br />Petitioner escrowed $7,500 to apply to the City's costs. Any costs incurred over and <br />above that amount shall be paid by Petitioner. <br />9. Petitioner intends to use the cartway for the following purposes: <br />a. Occasionally accessing the Land with residential lawn maintenance equipment; <br />and <br />b. Occasionally accessing the Land with normal residential vehicles. <br />10. The Land is not to be used for commercial purposes or any other purpose contrary to City <br />ordinances. <br />11. As the owner of Outlot A, the HOA will incur the following damages as a result of the <br />creation of the cartway: <br />a. Damage to the underlying land: $ <br />b. Damage to the existing improvements: $ <br />12. It is not appropriate for the City to maintain the cartway given its private usage. The cost <br />of maintenance must be equitably divided between the HOA and Petitioner based on <br />factors such as: <br />a. Frequency of use. <br />b. Type and weight of vehicles or equipment. <br />c. Distance traveled on the cartway to Petitioner's property. <br />13. The City finds that: <br />a. Petitioner's use will be sporadic and infrequent. The HOA members will <br />continue to use the private drive as a residential street for access to their homes. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.