Laserfiche WebLink
• <br />• <br />• <br />ROADWAY PAVEMENT CONDITION PROJECTIONS <br />Using the computer analysis, the expected useful life of each block was projected. This was done <br />using the maintenance approaches and the reconstruction levels that have occurred over the past <br />years within the City. This analysis showed that if the City continues its current process of <br />special maintenance and reconstruction at the same rate it has averaged over the past years, there <br />will be serious deterioration of the roadway system and ultimately very high reconstruction <br />expenses. It was projected that if current maintenance practices continue to be used over the <br />next 10 years, the number of miles of "problem" roadways will likely increase from today's less <br />than 13% of the system to more than 28 %. Not only would this reduction in the overall <br />condition of the roadways most likely be unacceptable to the public, it would be very expensive, <br />an estimated $39 million in 2014 (Plan Year 10), to restore the overall system at the end of that <br />time to only its current condition today (Figure 4). <br />Another example of the cost of deferring needed maintenance and reconstruction is illustrated by <br />the 2005 estimated cost of $2,375,700 for the reconstruction of West Shadow Lake Drive. It is <br />estimated the 2008 costs would be $2,750,000 due to increases in construction costs. <br />MAINTENANCE COSTS INCREASE AS PAVEMENT GETS OLDER <br />Maintenance costs increase considerably as the pavement gets older. The maintenance actions <br />and costs required to keep the roadway in its present condition are much less when the roadway <br />is relatively new and in good condition, allowing for sealcoating, rather than later when the <br />roadway is older and deteriorated when overlaying is required. The cost of overlaying is <br />typically 9 times the cost of sealcoating. Therefore, it is important that the proper maintenance <br />actions be taken at the optimal time to minimize maintenance costs and maximize the useful life <br />of the pavement. Figure 2 indicates that if the first sealcoating at year 7 was not done at a cost of <br />S20,000 per mile, the condition of the pavement would have declined to the extent that <br />overlaying would be warranted by year 14 at a cost of $180,000 per mile in today's dollars. The <br />graph indicates that at year 14, two sealcoatings would have occurred at a total cost of $40,000 <br />per mile, compared to a single overlaying of $180,000 per mile, for a savings of $140,000, <br />illustrating the eventual cost of deferring maintenance actions in today's dollars. <br />12 <br />-135- <br />