My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
08/22/2005 Council Packet
LinoLakes
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
1982-2020
>
2005
>
08/22/2005 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/28/2014 4:34:59 PM
Creation date
1/21/2014 12:02:18 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Council Document Type
Council Packet
Meeting Date
08/22/2005
Council Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
125
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• <br />• <br />MEMORANDUM FOR CITY OF LINO LAKES <br />FROM: Benton Erickson <br />Kristine Erickson <br />6868 W. Shadow LK. DR. <br />Lino Lakes, MN. 55014 <br />SUBJECT: VARIANCE <br />We would like to receive a variance to allow an addition on the northwest side of our <br />home. The City Building Department tells us we need a variance because the property is <br />located on Reshanau Lake. Without the variance we would not be able to build the <br />addition, and still have room to use our unattached garage. We only want to build <br />approximately 12 feet to the rear of the house and towards the lake. This layout will <br />allow us to meet the city requirement to have access from the current house, into the <br />addition, and still give us room to enter our unattached garage. Without a variance, the <br />only way to have access into the current house, from the proposed addition, would <br />require tearing off the attached garage and this still wouldn't leave enough room to enter <br />the unattached garage. <br />The proposed addition will fit nicely onto the existing house without being an eye <br />sore. We plan to use the additional space as a parent's apartment. The layout of our <br />existing house would make it impossible to do an addition on the south side of the house <br />and still have easy access from the driveway and garage. <br />If you look at the survey of the property you will see that our house is over 100 feet <br />from the lake. We do have a lower area in the back yard that causes the high water level <br />line to seem closer than on the lots next to us. In past years these lots had fill hauled in <br />that raised them slightly above the high water line. The house was built before the year of <br />the high water flood and has never had any water problems. The planned addition would <br />meet DNR requirements and be outside the minimum established distance needed to <br />build. Also the addition would blend in with the houses on both sides. <br />Bra A. Erich <br />Kristine M. Erickson <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.