Laserfiche WebLink
STAFF ORIGINATOR: <br />EDA <br />MEETING DATE: <br />TOPIC: <br />ACTION REQUIRED: <br />BACKGROUND <br />AGENDA ITEM 3 <br />Michael Grochala <br />September 12, 2005 <br />Consideration of Resolution No. 05 -02 <br />Approving First Amendment to Contract for <br />Private Development. Legacy at Woods Edge <br />Simple Majority <br />In October of 2004 the City Council approved the Contract for Private Development <br />between the Economic Development Authority (EDA), City and Hartford Development, <br />Inc., for the Legacy at Woods Edge project. Hartford Development closed on the City <br />owned property and the Tagg property in December of 2004. <br />Under Section 3.5 of the Contract referenced above, the EDA agreed to disburse <br />$1,700,000 to the "Development Property Owner" (an entity related to Hartford <br />Development, Inc.) under certain terms and conditions. Disbursement was a two -step <br />process: the funds were to be placed with an escrow agent after (among other things), <br />the City had approved a preliminary plat for the first townhome development. Then, <br />funds would be disbursed to the Development Property Owner when the City had <br />issued the first building permit for the townhomes, and the parties executed Assessment <br />Agreement setting minimum market values for the townhomes in an amount sufficient to <br />generate tax increment needed to repay the full $1,700,000 interfund loan. <br />Since that time, the original townhome proposal has been withdrawn, and Hartford is <br />working towards City approval of a mixed -use development as the first phase, including <br />60 units of workforce rental housing with associated commercial space and a separate <br />hotel facility. The current schedule calls for council consideration of the site plan and <br />final plat for that development on October 12. <br />The other key change since the date of the Contract is that the City has received a Met <br />Council grant in the amount of $750,000, which will reduce the Interfund Loan of City <br />funds by that amount. <br />Hartford has now requested that the Contract be amended to permit different terms for <br />dispersal of the $1.7 million. The reason for this request is that Hartford purchased the <br />"TIF Parcel" from Tagg under a note and mortgage, which Hartford expected to pay with <br />proceeds of the Interfund Loan (assuming the conditions described above would be <br />met, given the expected townhome development). When the townhome development <br />