Laserfiche WebLink
09/01/2005 <br />• <br />• <br />• <br />2 <br />Memo <br />Footnote discussion of amended 2006 Budget: <br />1. Monitoring and Assessment. The previously approved amounts for the volunteer <br />lake monitoring program and the Ramsey County lab work were continued. Lambert <br />Creek monitoring data collection was deferred pending the Water Plan and further <br />discussion with the St. Paul Regional Water Service (SPRWS). <br />2. Outside professional consultants. As larger capital improvement projects and <br />education pilot projects would be defined in the Water Plan this area was trimmed <br />back to level that would allow for development plan reviews by an engineering <br />consultant and some additional education (double 2005) monies. It was strongly <br />suggested that the application fee structure be reviewed and updated (see income <br />item) with costs such as engineering reviews of applications be considered a `pass - <br />through' cost borne by the applicant. Legal and financial consulting budgets were <br />maintained as approved. <br />3. Information Systems. A website upgrade, including links to all of the member sites <br />was considered essential and need not be deferred to 2007. The website upgrade was <br />increased from $1500 to $2000. This upgrade will stop short of making our database <br />available on -line. Updating our database first will most likely be an Implementation <br />item in the Water Plan. Computer systems budget was decreased from $4400 to <br />$3500. This however, could still allow for the purchase of a new computer for an <br />intern to use this year and potentially a full -time staff person to use in the future. <br />This item should include set -up and networking assistance. <br />4. Office. This was increased over the current level of $3300 to $4000. But it did not <br />assume moving to a market rate office space at the $15,000. Nor does it fund most <br />potential office upgrades (desks & file system) that have been identified if <br />VLAWMO adds a staff person. <br />5. Insurance. This is increased slightly over 2005 ($2600 to $2700), but somewhat <br />lower than approved 2006 of $3200. Workers compensation will not be needed for <br />the second person. <br />6. Maintenance. This item was considered essential, but costs were not broken out by <br />project area. The amount was increased from $7500 to $10,000. <br />7. Administration. The amount for the administrator was left as budgeted. The intern <br />funding was cut to $7000 based on the experience committee members. The <br />committee recommends deferring the additional staff person until the Water Plan <br />Implementation program is available. At that time VLAWMO may have a clearer <br />vision of the needs to met by staff person. One member suggested VLAWMO may <br />want to reduce or eliminate the engineering consultant budget item and might be <br />better served by hiring a staff engineer. <br />8. Training. With 1.5 staff rather than 2.5 staff persons, training was left at its current <br />level ($700) rather than the approved $1400. <br />9. Misc. and Contingency. This amount was reduced to the current level of $1000 <br />rather than the approved $11,800 that anticipated moving, resetting up the office and <br />hiring another full time staff person. <br />10. Water Plan. Similar Water Plans in the metro area have been costing at least <br />$100,000. Particular attention will be paid to Goals & Policies and Implementation <br />Program, providing a level of detail now required by State Rules. The Water Plan <br />must be expedited and may cost more as a result. The recommended 2006 budget <br />($75,000) would bring the total available for the Water Plan update to $1 10,000. <br />11. Fees for Service. The current pricing structure will be reviewed and updated. <br />