My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
12/12/2005 Council Packet
LinoLakes
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
1982-2020
>
2005
>
12/12/2005 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/29/2014 10:01:25 AM
Creation date
1/24/2014 9:53:13 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Council Document Type
Council Packet
Meeting Date
12/12/2005
Council Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
98
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
SPECIAL COUNCIL WORK SESSION <br />DRAFT <br />SEPTEMBER 8, 2005 <br />1 probably an unrealistic goal as the Comprehensive Plan was written in the late 1990's and <br />2 adopted by the City Council in 2001. The tax rate at the time the Comprehensive Plan <br />3 was adopted was approximately 35.9 %. The next year the state legislature shifted class <br />4 rates and state aid payments and assumed funding responsibility for general education. <br />5 As a result, the school district tax rate was reduced significantly and the City tax rate <br />6 increased to 53.1 %. The result on property owners was a tax reduction for that tax year. <br />7 <br />8 Councilmember Stoltz inquired about a comparable rate for the Comprehensive Plan, <br />9 given the shift of funds by the legislature. Finance Director Rolek advised that under the <br />10 funding and class rate shifts, a tax rate of about 36% would be comparable to the 20% <br />11 stated in the Comprehensive Plan. Under the new scenario, the City would need to <br />12 decrease the tax rate about 1% per year to achieve a 36% tax rate in 2020 (53% - 36% = <br />13 17 %, over an 18 year period). <br />14 <br />15 Finance Director Rolek noted the City's tax rate for 2005 was 42.223 %, which was well <br />16 below the projected rate of 49% to achieve a 36% rate by 2020 (2005 -2001 = 4 years. <br />17 53 %- 4 % =49 %). <br />18 <br />19 Council discussed the differences in the three recommendations further resulting in a <br />20 compromised budget plan. Councilmember Dahl proposed an alternative budget plan that <br />21 reached an agreement for approval. Major differences in the two plans including the <br />22 funding levels for contracted secretarial services, street maintenance and the construction <br />23 of new trails. A detailed discussion was held on spending approximately $20,000 per <br />24 year for contracted meeting minutes and the need for detailed or verbatim minutes. <br />25 <br />26 Council determined that the costs for contracted minutes for advisory boards would be <br />27 eliminated, as existing staff will record the minutes. Council meeting minutes would <br />28 continue to be contracted out. The minutes taken by staff would be in detail for public <br />29 hearings and if any Councilmember is not satisfied with the detail of public hearing <br />30 minutes it would be discussed by the Council. <br />31 <br />32 After further discussion, a compromised budget from the two alternative budget plans <br />33 was proposed. This proposal consisted of the following cuts: <br />34 <br />35 Roads $ 47,500 <br />36 Secretarial Services $ 7,200 <br />37 Tier III Parks $ 24,000 <br />38 Contingency Fund $ 14,000 <br />39 Capital Equipment $ 27,000 <br />40 Trails $ 20,000 <br />41 Total Additional Adjustment $139,700 <br />42 First Adjustments $285,388 <br />43 <br />44 TOTAL ADJUSTMENTS $425,088 <br />45 <br />3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.