My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
01/10/2011 Council Packet
LinoLakes
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
1982-2020
>
2011
>
01/10/2011 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/29/2014 10:20:09 AM
Creation date
1/27/2014 8:33:27 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Council Document Type
Council Packet
Meeting Date
01/10/2011
Council Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
85
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• <br />• <br />• <br />AGENDA ITEM 6.0 <br />STAFF ORIGINATOR: Paul Bengtson <br />CC MEETING DATE: January 10, 2011 <br />TOPIC: First Reading of Ordinance Number 04 -11, <br />amending the Zoning Ordinance requirements for <br />Home Occupations <br />BACKGROUND <br />The City Council was approached by a resident to determine if the treatment of <br />retail sales was appropriately addressed in the Home Occupation standards <br />adopted by the City Council on February 22, 2010. <br />Retail sales were limited specifically to products that were produced on the site <br />that the sales were to occur only. <br />RETAIL SALES ISSUES <br />The ordinance, as adopted on February 22, 2010, included the following <br />statement in the General Provisions section, and is therefore applicable to all <br />Home Occupations that operate in the city: <br />No retail of anything produced off -site. <br />Staffs intention behind the use of the word 'retail' was to prohibit direct sales to <br />customer on the site only. It was not meant to prohibit mail order businesses or <br />those that include delivery services. In retrospect, it was also not staffs intention <br />to prohibit sales to customers already onsite for a service business (barber, <br />massage, etc...), nor was it necessarily meant to prohibit sales events conducted <br />by invitation (Tupperware, Pampered Chef, Avon, etc...). As such, a clarification <br />may be in order. <br />The issue that needs to be determined is which levels of Home Occupations <br />these types of sales may be appropriate within. Remembering that the city <br />allows any property to operate an A or B level Home Occupation, while only <br />properties that front arterials roadways, are zoned Rural, or have over 1 acre of <br />land can apply for the CUP required to operate a Level C Home Occupation. <br />Staff has the following recommendation for treatment of these types of `retail' <br />activities: <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.