My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
02/07/2011 Council Packet
LinoLakes
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
1982-2020
>
2011
>
02/07/2011 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/29/2014 10:35:32 AM
Creation date
1/27/2014 11:04:34 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Council Document Type
Council Packet
Meeting Date
02/07/2011
Council Meeting Type
Work Session Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
76
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
External Correspondence <br />To: Phil Belfiori <br />District Administrator, RCWD <br />Date: January 26, 2011 <br />Cc: File R105555- 080.003 <br />Tom Schmidt, RCWD <br />Elizabeth Hosch, RCWD <br />Houston Engineering Inc. <br />From: Chris Otterness, P.E. <br />Through: Mark Deutschman, P.E., Ph.D. <br />Subject: Effects on Water Quality and Volume <br />Century Farms North — Permit 02 -0129 <br />HEI Project No. R105555- 080.003 Task 001 <br />RCWD Account No. 80 -03 -4500 <br />Introduction <br />The purpose of this memorandum is to provide the Rice Creek Watershed District (RCWD) with a <br />qualitative assessment of impacts to water quality and runoff volumes resulting from alternatives for <br />restoring function to an infiltration basin (hereafter referred to as "Basin E2 ") in the Century Farms North <br />development. A memorandum entitled Drainage Alternatives for Centzny Fa rnzs and dated January 11, <br />2011 detailed the history and cause of the non - functioning infiltration basin and outlined two potential <br />alternatives as corrective measures. In a subsequent meeting with City of Lino Lakes staff; a third option of <br />accepting the E2 infiltration basin as-is (i.e. a "no- action" alternative) was discussed and considered. This <br />memorandum is intended to qualitatively address the water quality and volume consequences of a "no- <br />action" alternative compared to the "design" conditions and the other two alternatives capable of correcting <br />the basin's function. <br />Impacts on Peak Flow Rates and Runoff Volumes <br />Per RCWD rule C (effective August 1998 to February 2008), Basin E2 was designed with the intent to <br />provide some infiltration of stormwater runoff and reduction of downstream runoff volumes from its <br />contributing drainage area of 22- acres. Specifically, the design standard under the permit was a requirement <br />to infiltrate runoff from a 0.34 -inch precipitation event for the contributing impervious surface area; i.e., <br />255 -cubic feet for Basin E -2. Even though borings were submitted and reviewed as part of the permit <br />review process, due to tailwater and elevated ground water levels this basin currently provides little or no <br />infiltration for the design volume. Because of constraints provided by the existing elevations and structures <br />at this location, we are not aware of a feasible alternative to retrofit the basin or the development as a whole <br />to achieve the infiltration required by District rules as they existed at the time of the permit. <br />The two main issues relative to stormwater runoff are maintaining the pre - development peak rate of runoff <br />and achieving the volume control standard. The contributing drainage area to Basin E2 is less than one fifth <br />of the total project area of approximately 122 acres for the entire Century Farms North development and is <br />a small fraction of the overall Century Farms development (which is approximately 280 acres). Because of <br />the considerable storage provided by four open water (i.e., wet) ponds immediately downstream of Basin <br />E2, the storage volume provided by Basin E2 (or lack thereof), has no quantifiable impact on water surface <br />elevations or peak flow rates downstream of the basin. The E2 infiltration basin was intended to intercept <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.