Laserfiche WebLink
• <br />• <br />• <br />WS — Item 2 <br />WORK SESSION STAFF REPORT <br />Work Session Item 2 <br />Date: Council Work Session, March 7, 2011 <br />To: City Council <br />From: Michael Grochala <br />Re: Rice Creek Watershed District - Water Management District <br />Anoka County Ditch 10 -22 -32 <br />Background <br />Phil Belfiori, Administrator for the Rice Creek Watershed District (RCWD), discussed the <br />request with the Council at the February 7, 2011 work session. The Council directed staff to <br />place the item on the March works session agenda for further discussion. A question was asked <br />regarding whether the City Charter limited the City's ability to concur with the request. The City <br />Attorney has responded that Section 1.02 of the City Charter reserves all power to the City <br />unless otherwise stated, and there is nothing within the document that would restrict the <br />council's authority with respect to this issue. <br />Anoka County Ditch (ACD) 10 -22 -32 is located in the NW corner of Lino Lakes with portions <br />of the system and /or contributing area extending into both Blaine and Columbus. The RCWD, <br />the ditch authority for 10- 22 -32, is working on a repair report for the ditch system. The report is <br />part of a systematic effort by the RCWD to inspect, maintain & repair all public drainage <br />systems. <br />Under state law the Rice Creek Watershed District may undertake proceedings related to the <br />drainage system in accordance with the Watershed Law (Minnesota Statute Chapter 103D) rather <br />than the Drainage Code (Minnesota Statutes Chapter 103E) subject to concurrence by the city <br />council where the system is located. This alternative authority was created by the state <br />legislature to simplify the improvement and repair process to more adequately and economically <br />improve and repair drainage systems in the metropolitan area. <br />The RCWD is requesting City consideration of a resolution consenting to their proposal to use its <br />watershed law and metropolitan surface water management authorities to finance the repairs. If <br />they do not get concurrence from each of the City's, they are forced to stay within the antiquated <br />and narrow confines of ditch law. The cities of Blaine and Columbus have previously consented <br />to this approach. <br />The Environmental Board reviewed the request in June of 2010 and recommended approval. <br />The RCWD previously provided an overview of the ditch system and this request to the city <br />council in June of 2010. No action was taken by the council. Concurrence with the use of <br />1 <br />