Laserfiche WebLink
• <br />• <br />• <br />CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION March 7, 2011 <br />DRAFT <br />1 CITY OF LINO LAKES <br />2 MINUTES <br />3 <br />4 DATE : March 7, 2011 <br />5 TIME STARTED : 5:33 p.m. <br />6 TIME ENDED : 9:55 p.m. <br />7 MEMBERS PRESENT : Council Member Gallup, Rafferty, Roeser & <br />8 Mayor Reinert <br />9 MEMBERS ABSENT : Council Member O'Donnell <br />10 <br />11 <br />12 Staff members present: City Administrator Jeff Karlson; Director of Administration Dan <br />13 Tesch; Director of Public Services Rick DeGardner; Director of Public Safety Kent <br />14 Strege; Director of Finance Al Rolek; Director of Community Development Michael <br />15 Grochala; Economic Development Coordinator Mary Alice Divine; City Engineer Jim <br />16 Studenski; City Planner Jeff Smyser; City Clerk Julie Bartell <br />17 <br />18 1. CSAH 34 (Birch Street) Corridor Study — Community Development Director <br />19 Grochala reported that this study has been in progress for the past two years, having <br />20 originally been identified as a city goal in 2008. Anoka County took the leadership role; <br />21 the study has been prepared by SRF Consulting Group. He introduced Jack Corkle, <br />22 Anoka County, and John Hagen and Brian Shorten, SRF Consulting Group. <br />23 <br />24 <br />25 <br />26 <br />27 <br />28 <br />29 <br />30 <br />31 <br />32 <br />33 <br />34 <br />35 <br />36 <br />37 When a council member asked for an explanation of why the recommendation is for some <br />38 two -lane section and some four -lane, Ms. Corkle explained that the county has looked at <br />39 the numbers (traffic) very carefully and they feel the two -lane is appropriate in a portion <br />40 of the corridor but in the more highly accessed area, four -lane is appropriate. The use of <br />41 some two -lane is a cost saver also. <br />42 <br />43 When a council member asked why trails are included on both sides of the roadway, Ms. <br />44 Corkle responded that there is a challenge to get people from both sides of the corridor to <br />Mr. Shorten updated the council on the process used to prepare the study and reviewed <br />the overall recommendations. He noted that it has come forward through a public <br />process during which they found clear concerns about needs for the roadway including <br />high levels of congestion during peak hours, accessibility to the roadway and bike and <br />pedestrian concerns. A transportation advisory group was formed with the goals of <br />improving safety, mobility and design for the corridor. In explaining the elements of the <br />study and recommendations and noting concerns heard about the use of a raised median, <br />Mr. Shorten noted the ability to stay with a two -lane roadway in some areas. The study <br />contains different options but all could be accommodated within the proposed right of <br />way. As the council makes decisions about the corridor, they will have flexibility in the <br />planning that's been done. He noted that the report's executive summary reflects the <br />revisions that have occurred within the report. <br />1 <br />P54 <br />