Laserfiche WebLink
CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION March 7, 2011 <br />DRAFT <br />134 The mayor suggested that a discussion about that possibility would be allowed. He asked <br />135 for an explanation about what is different about this proposal from those rejected in the <br />136 past? Ms. Divine responded that the project is somewhat smaller than the previous but <br />137 actually there is not much difference in proposals; she added that the council heard pros <br />138 and cons from the neighborhood about the project in past discussions and that's to be <br />139 expected. The mayor suggested that the idea of the site being commercial probably isn't <br />140 the problem but there seems to be concern about the type of projects they've seen <br />141 proposed. <br />142 <br />143 The council heard more about what other development could be seen in the area and how <br />144 it could come on line; the market dictates a kind of grow as you go process at the current <br />145 time. <br />146 <br />147 The developer suggested that they would like to be able to solidify their plans and bring <br />148 them through the city process for site planning and they'd like to know the council's <br />149 opinion. The mayor remarked that the proposal seems very similar to the last one the <br />150 council saw for the site and that was deemed undesirable. He recognizes the site is a <br />151 good one for a grocery but isn't certain that this plan couldn't get better; it concerns him <br />152 that the store would be so close to the residential area and that it includes no <br />153 improvement for the 49 Club property. Another council member added that he has some <br />154 concerns about the box architecture and other elements so he isn't in a strong support <br />155 position at this time. <br />156 <br />157 Staff noted that site planning would be key for this development; staff will continue to <br />158 work with the developer and report back. <br />159 <br />160 4. Otter Lake Road extension request - Economic Development Coordinator <br />161 Divine introduced Bruce Miller, owner and proposed developer of the property on the <br />162 northeast quadrant of the intersection of I35E and County Road 14, as well as Bill <br />163 Griffith who is assisting Mr. Miller. The project proposed is a fast food restaurant for <br />164 which both roadway and utilities would be required. <br />165 <br />166 Mr. Miller, MFC Properties Corporation, introduced his company that has been in <br />167 business for 38 years and that manages office, retail and medical office facilities. They <br />168 have experience in growing areas and in phased development. At the site in question, the <br />169 company owns 18 acres. It is an area that has been planned for growth for some time and <br />170 more so now that the interchange improvements are underway. Mr. Miller reviewed the <br />171 site plan before the council noting that they are ready to submit their plat for approval if <br />172 they can get an Otter Lake Road extension. The question he brings to the city is how the <br />173 necessary road work can be achieved. <br />174 <br />175 Mr. Griffith added the company has set objectives for the site and if those can be met, <br />176 they're comfortable they can make the financing work. The question is being posed as to <br />177 how far the roadway should go? Their plans for call 330 feet of roadway only to <br />178 accommodate the first development — incremental building is really the name of the game <br />4 <br />P57 <br />• <br />• <br />