My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
04/11/2011 Council Packet
LinoLakes
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
1982-2020
>
2011
>
04/11/2011 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/29/2014 11:33:26 AM
Creation date
1/28/2014 11:55:59 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Council Document Type
Council Packet
Meeting Date
04/11/2011
Council Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
62
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• <br />• No direct network construction or equipment costs for stated capabilities other than any <br />costs associated with preparing co- location sites to meet stated specifications (at least for <br />the first seven years or unless network upgrades are necessary). <br />• The ability to communicate with other entities on the Zayo system. <br />• Potential economic development benefits of having high -speed data transmission <br />facilities and services available to businesses. <br />• Narrowing the gap between information "haves" and "have -nots" in Anoka County. <br />In the end, each municipality must independently gauge its own tolerance for risk against the <br />actual or perceived benefits of executing the Final Agreement. This calculus may vary from city <br />to city. However, any municipality that does decide to enter into the Final Agreement should, at <br />a minimum: <br />• Participate in any network governance or policy group that is established to manage the <br />Zayo system; <br />• Carefully monitor network traffic and congestion, and document network unavailability <br />and service deficiencies; <br />• Maintain adequate insurance and liability limits to protect against costs and damages that <br />may arise out of the Final Agreement; <br />• Regularly evaluate what alternative services are available and at what cost (particularly in <br />the event a municipality needs to terminate service at a co- location site using the 60 -day <br />termination provision and to quickly find a new service provider); <br />• Carefully consider and plan for current and future bandwidth needs, and assess whether <br />those needs can be met or are best met by the Zayo system, considering its capabilities <br />and limitations; <br />• Precisely and comprehensively define the underlying rights being granted to the County <br />and Zayo for co- location sites in an agreement or other legal instrument (which would be <br />included in Attachment I to the Final Agreement); and <br />• Ensure that permits and easements granted to Zayo contain adequate protective language <br />or conditions, and do not authorize the construction or operation of a cable system or the <br />provision of cable service without obtaining a franchise, to the extent required by <br />applicable law. We would recommend that all municipalities in the County utilize the <br />same language and conditions, to the extent possible. <br />* * * <br />As always, please feel free to contact me with any questions or concerns you may have. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.