Laserfiche WebLink
• <br />• <br />• <br />CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION <br />DRAFT <br />April 4, 2011 P 2 0 <br />1 CITY OF LINO LAKES <br />2 MINUTES <br />3 <br />4 DATE : April 4, 2010 <br />5 TIME STARTED : 5:30 p.m. <br />6 TIME ENDED : 9:15 p.m. <br />7 MEMBERS PRESENT : Councilmember Gallup, O'Donnell, <br />8 Rafferty, Roeser and Mayor Reinert <br />9 MEMBERS ABSENT : None <br />10 <br />11 <br />12 Staff members present: City Administrator Jeff Karlson; City Attorney Joseph Langel; <br />13 Police Chief Kent Strege; City Engineer Jim Studenski; Finance Director Al Rolek; City <br />14 Planner Jeff Smyser; Economic Development Coordinator Mary Alice Divine; City Clerk <br />15 Julie Bartell <br />16 <br />17 1. Board of Appeals — Anoka County Assessor Linda Weiner was present. She <br />18 reminded the council that the city's Board of Appeals meeting is scheduled for April 25, <br />19 at 6:00 p.m. and also that at least one trained member of the council must be present in <br />20 order to conduct the meeting. <br />21 <br />22 The council received the County Assessor's Report to the City of Lino Lakes Local Board <br />23 of Appeal and Equalization (LBAE) book. Ms. Weiner briefly reviewed the book, noting <br />24 in particular the information on the city's valuation change for 2011, the percentage of <br />25 foreclosure sales, qualified sales numbers as well as the number of new construction <br />26 units. She noted that she's received twenty five calls at this point, a low number, with <br />27 most asking questions about the relationship of their valuation to an increase in taxes. <br />28 She's heard from persons who have purchased foreclosure property and want their <br />29 valuation to be directly linked to what they paid. <br />30 <br />31 A council member asked about the valuation of lots and Ms. Weiner suggested that isn't a <br />32 common concern since there have been very few lots sold; the value would likely be <br />33 based on the price paid minus the value of house on it. Regarding business valuations, <br />34 Ms. Weiner explained that her colleague (who was not present) mainly deals with that <br />35 element; he will be present at the board meeting. <br />36 <br />37 In summation Ms. Weiner suggested that she anticipates few attendees at the board <br />38 meeting. <br />39 <br />40 2. Anoka County Connect Fiber Project — City Administrator Karlson noted that <br />41 the council heard about the Connect Anoka County Project at their last work session but <br />42 some questions were outstanding. Also North Metro Cable Commission asked their <br />43 telecommunications attorney, Steve Gu7zetta, to review the proposed services agreement <br />44 and he raised questions. Mr. Karlson introduced Assistant Anoka County Attorney <br />45 Kathryn Timm and Anoka County Deputy Administrator David Minke to discuss the <br />