My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
05/02/2011 Council Packet
LinoLakes
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
1982-2020
>
2011
>
05/02/2011 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/13/2014 2:36:35 PM
Creation date
1/28/2014 12:46:08 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Council Document Type
Council Packet
Meeting Date
05/02/2011
Council Meeting Type
Work Session Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
128
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• <br />• <br />Non - conforming sites are usually the result of changes to parking, setbacks, ponding, and <br />lot size requirements. The existing non - conforming use that was legally established may <br />continue on such a site, but any change in use would require bringing the lot into <br />conformance with today's standards for parking, setbacks, ponding, etc... <br />Non - conforming uses may continue to be operated on a site in perpetuity. Should the use <br />cease, it may be replaced with the same use within 12 months time, and can then continue <br />again in perpetuity. However, if 12 months pass and the use is not re- established, the use <br />is no longer allowed on the site and all subsequent use of the site/building must be <br />allowed by the current zoning ordinance. <br />The reason for establishing non - conforming regulations is twofold. First, it guarantees <br />the current property owner/business owner's rights to continue to use the site as was <br />previously allowed by the city. Secondly, it provides a mechanism to eventually spur the <br />redevelopment of the site with a use that is considered to be appropriate with the current <br />regulations of the city. <br />b. Lack of Infrastructure and Fire Code Issues <br />As required by the Joint Powers Agreement with the Centennial Fire District, the city has <br />adopted a fire code that requires the majority of all commercial /industrial buildings that <br />are over 2,000 square feet in size to have a fire suppression system. (A 60 foot buffer <br />around all sides of the building and on the same lot as the building can take the place of a <br />fire suppression system in some cases.) <br />The city could entertain increasing this threshold by eliminating this section of the fire <br />code, but to do so would also mean renegotiating the Joint Powers Agreement with the <br />other cities and the Fire District, and the likelihood of higher insurance rates and reduced <br />public safety faced by both the city and its residents. City Council has previously <br />determined that it is not interested in revising the City's Fire Code to have less restrictive <br />fire suppression requirements. <br />For sites that have city water, installing a fire suppression system can easily be <br />accomplished. For those sites that are not on public utilities, the cost of improving the <br />private well to provide fire suppression may not be cost effective, and the money spent <br />does little to improve the value of the land itself, since public utilities are still not present <br />for future development. There is little incentive on the part of a business owner to make <br />such an investment. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.