My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
01-27-14 Council Packet
LinoLakes
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
1982-2020
>
2014
>
01-27-14 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/7/2014 12:04:56 PM
Creation date
1/28/2014 1:24:05 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Council Document Type
Council Packet
Meeting Date
01/27/2014
Council Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
150
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION January 6, 2014 <br />DRAFT <br /> 3 <br />The co uncil discussed the possible costs and the impact of not doing drainage 89 <br />improvements i n the area. C osts could be asse ssed to benefited properties in the future as 90 <br />development fees. 91 <br /> 92 <br />3. 7309 Lake Drive Code Enforcement – Community Development Director G rochala 93 <br />said staff is providing an update on this code enforcement issue – his staff report explains 94 <br />the history and why staff feels that Mobile Mini is not in compliance wi th the city code. 95 <br />In September they proposed a settlement by way of a contract tha t would allow the 96 <br />current lease activities to remain through 2017 when restrictions would eliminate ext erior 97 <br />storage. In the meantime there would be limitations on height and additional screening. 98 <br />Their attorney would like to understand if the council wo uld consider such an agreement. 99 <br />The agreement would provide some certaint y for the future. 100 <br /> 101 <br />The Mayor noted that reviewing the history of the site apparently didn’t result in 102 <br />information that supports the current use but enforcement would only serve to empty the 103 <br />site and that wouldn’t be good for the city. 104 <br /> 105 <br />Council Member Roeser asked about the proposal for use by a bus company and Mr. 106 <br />Grochala explained that that would still require a zoning review and change. 107 <br /> 108 <br />4. Advisory Board Appointments – Admini strator Karlson reviewed the written report 109 <br />indicating the seats and applicants for advisory boards. The council has indicated that 110 <br />they would like to interview all applicants and staff requests that a time for those 111 <br />interviews be reserved. 112 <br /> 113 <br />The coun cil requested that new questions be prepared for the applicants (the same 114 <br />questions have been used for some time) and the questions should represent more of the 115 <br />established goals of the group as well as an orientation on the type of advisory duties 116 <br />anticip ated. 117 <br /> 118 <br />The council concurred to hold interviews at a special session at 5:30 p.m. on January 13 119 <br />and 6:00 p.m. on the 20 th (the 20 th was later change d to the 21 st in consideration of 120 <br />Monday being a legal holiday). 121 <br /> 122 <br />Snow Plowing (not on agenda) – Council Mem ber Rafferty remarked that when 123 <br />snowplowing is done on Friday, people have their garbage containers out and they tend to 124 <br />interfere with the plowing . Administrator Karlson said he would report back on what 125 <br />could be done to address that situation. Mayor R einert suggested that some information 126 <br />from staff on the city’s free market hauler system would be appreciated. 127 <br /> 128 <br />5. Monthly Progress Report – Administrator Karlson reviewed the written report. 129 <br /> 130 <br />Regarding the White Bear Lake Restoration Assn. v. Departme nt Natural Resources item, 131 <br />Administrator Karlson explained that it relates to a lawsuit filed against the DNR about 132 <br />low lake levels and the city is named in that suit. One proposal right now is that the 133
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.