My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
01-27-14 Council Packet
LinoLakes
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
1982-2020
>
2014
>
01-27-14 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/7/2014 12:04:56 PM
Creation date
1/28/2014 1:24:05 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Council Document Type
Council Packet
Meeting Date
01/27/2014
Council Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
150
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
CITY COUNCIL <br />AGENDA ITEM 3C <br /> <br /> <br />STAFF ORIG INATOR: Jeff Karlson <br /> <br />MEETING DATE: January 27, 2014 <br /> <br />TOPIC: White Bear Lake Water Level Lawsuit <br /> <br />VOTE REQUIRED: 3/5 <br /> <br /> <br />INTRODUCTION <br /> <br />The City Council is being asked to consider Lino Lakes’ participation in a Joint Powers Agreement <br />to create a formal coalition to intervene in the White Bear Lake Restoration Assn. v. State of <br />Minnesota lawsuit. <br /> <br />BACKGROUND <br /> <br />The White Bear Lake Restoration Association filed a lawsuit alleging that the Minnesota <br />Department of Na tural Resources (DNR) violated the Minnesota Environmental Rights Act by <br />increasing municipal water a ppropriation s permits for a number of cities near White Bear Lake, <br />which has resulted in increased groundwater pumping from high -capacity wells that have c aused a <br />lowering of the water level of White Bear Lake. <br /> <br />The following ten cities were named in the lawsuit: Centerville, Columbus, Forest Lake, Hugo, <br />Lino Lakes, Mahtomedi, North St. Paul, Vadnais Heights, White Bear Lake, and White Bear <br />Township. On Jan uary 6, representatives from these ten cities met to discuss the feasibility of <br />entering into a joint powers agreement to intervene in the lawsuit in order to protect the cities <br />mutual interests and its ability to supply municipal water. This would involv e retaining and paying <br />for legal counsel, engaging and paying for scientific experts, and establish ing a method to determine <br />tactical decisions with regard to the lawsuit. <br /> <br />Most of the cities brought their legal counsel to the January 6 meeting, so there was much debate <br />about the best course of action and potential cost for a legal defense. The representatives did agree <br />on a proposed cost allocation for cities voting in favor o f intervention in the lawsuit. The cost share <br />would be a percentage based on 50% of each city’s population and 50% of total gallons of water <br />pumped in 2012. The cost estimate for Lino Lakes would be about $15,000 if every city <br />participated and the expenses amounted to $100,000. <br /> <br />The cities agreed to bring the idea of forming a c oalition to their councils for consider ation. Forest <br />Lake, Hugo, Mahtomedi, and North St. Paul have already declined to participate. If Lino Lakes <br />elects not to participate, Vadnais Heights will likely drop out as well since they established a 60% <br />partic ipation requirement on the basis of the combined population/water usage totals of all ten cities <br />and a $125,000 expenditure cap. At the current participation numbers, Lino Lakes cost share would <br />be over $30,000 if expenditures reached $125,000. <br /> <br />R ECOMMEND ATION <br /> <br />Staff is seeking direction from the Council.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.