My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
05/23/2011 Council Packet
LinoLakes
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
1982-2020
>
2011
>
05/23/2011 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/13/2014 12:28:51 PM
Creation date
1/29/2014 9:34:05 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Council Document Type
Council Packet
Meeting Date
05/23/2011
Council Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
106
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Al <br />WSB <br />cf <br />As-soda/es. Inc. <br />May 20, 2011 <br />Engineering ■ Planning • Environmental • Construction <br />Mr. Michael Grochala, Community Development Director <br />City of Lino Lakes <br />600 Town Center Parkway <br />Lino Lakes, MN 55014 -1182 <br />Re: City Engineering — General Service Rates <br />Dear Mr. Grochala: <br />701 Xenia Avenue South <br />Suite 300 <br />Minneapolis, MN 55416 <br />Tel: 763- 541 -4800 <br />Fax: 763 -541 -1700 <br />We are in receipt of your letter dated May 12, 2011, requesting additional information pertaining to our <br />proposed engineering fees. Specifically, you requested the names of the two personnel that will be <br />assigned to perform the tasks outlined in your letter as well as their hourly rates. You also requested the <br />rates for reimbursable expenses not included in the hourly rates. The proposed engineers we included in <br />our proposal to perform a majority of the engineering tasks outlined in your letter are as follows: <br />Jason Wedel, City Engineer <br />Jeremy Koenen, Assistant City Engineer <br />$121 per hour <br />$96 per hour <br />Please be sure to note that all miscellaneous expenses such as copying, mileage, etc., are included in our <br />hourly rates. This is unusual in our industry and can reduce total costs by 3 -5 %, so we hope that you <br />include that in your analysis. <br />We still firmly believe that our original proposal based on a flat fee is in the best interest of the City. <br />Simply comparing hourly rates between engineering firms will not provide the City with the complete <br />picture. We proposed a flat fee purposefully in an effort to drive innovation and performance. We <br />specialize in municipal engineering and can provide the services the City needs more efficiently than <br />anyone else. This contract arrangement is currently being used with our clients in Rosemount, Champlin, <br />and Minnestrista among others. Please do not hesitate to contact these cities and ask them how the flat <br />rate is working for them. <br />After reviewing the tasks outlined in your letter and comparing it to the list of tasks we included in our <br />proposal, there were three additional items on your list. These items are Pavement Management, <br />NPDES /Surface Water Management, and foundation elevation surveys. We recommend modifying our <br />original proposal to include Pavement Management and NPDES /Surface Water Management. The annual <br />fee would, therefore, increase from $62,400 to $72,400 after adding these tasks. Due to the variable nature <br />of foundation elevation surveys, we would recommend completing those separately on an "as- needed" <br />basis at our standard hourly rate shown in our fee schedule. <br />We are confident that either method that you utilize, flat fee or hourly, that WSB will be the most <br />competitive and provide the overall lowest cost. We want you to get a partner that is committed to <br />finding the best long -term solutions. We are willing to provide service using a partial flat fee and partial <br />Minneapolis ■ St. Cloud <br />Equal Opportunity Employer <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.