06/27/2011 Council Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Search

P31 ORDINANCE NO. 12 -11 ORDINANCE VACATING A PLAYGROUND EASEMENT ON LOT 1 BLOCK 1 OF VILLAGE NO. 3 (YMCA). The City Council of the City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota does ordain: Section 1 Findings 1. The City Council of Lino Lakes has determined to vacate in its entirety the playground easement described as: A permanent easement for a play ground and recreational purposes over and across the following described parcel: Lot 1, Block 1, THE VILLAGE NO. 3, according to the recorded plat thereof, Anoka County, Minnesota. Said permanent easement for play ground and recreational purposes being that part of the above described parcel which lies within the following described area: Commencing at the southeast corner of said Lot 1, Block 1, THE VILLAGE NO. 3, according to the recorded plat thereof, Anoka County, Minnesota; thence on an assumed bearing of North 0 degrees 00 minutes 19 seconds West along the easterly line of said Lot 1 a distance of 446.76 feet to an angle point in said easterly line of Lot 1; thence North 89 degrees 33 minutes 45 seconds West, along the northerly and easterly line of said Lot 1, a distance of 108.94 feet to an angle point in said easterly line of said Lot 1; thence North 0 degrees 08 minutes 37 seconds East along said easterly line a distance of 85.00 feet to the point of beginning; thence continuing North 0 degrees 08 minutes 37 seconds East, along said east line of Lot 1, a distance of 95.00 feet to the most northerly and easterly corner of said Lot 1; thence North 89 degrees 33 minutes 45 seconds West, along the northerly line of said Lot 1 a distance of 95.00 feet; thence South 0 degrees 08 minutes 37 seconds West, 95.00 feet; thence South 89 degrees 33 minutes 45 seconds East, 95.00 feet to the point of beginning. Said permanent easement containing 9,025 square feet (0.207 acres) more or less 2. A public hearing was held on June 27, 2011 before the City Council in the City Hall Council Chambers after due published and posted notice had been given and a reasonable attempt was made to give personal notice to all affected property owners, and all persons interested were given an opportunity to be heard; and 3. The disposition of this property interest has no relationship to the comprehensive municipal plan and therefore the requirement of MN Statute 462.356 for a recommendation from the Planning & Zoning Board does not apply; and