Laserfiche WebLink
• <br />• <br />• <br />c. Storage area is blacktopped or concrete surfaced unless specifically approved by the <br />City Council. <br />d. All lighting shall be in compliance with Section 3, Subd. 4.F of this Ordinance or <br />other lighting standards in place at the time of project approval. <br />e. The storage area does not take up parking space or loading space as required for <br />conformity to this Ordinance and not in front yards. <br />f. The property shall not abut property zoned for residential, rural, or business use, <br />including land in a neighboring city. "Abutting" includes across a street. "Abutting" <br />does not include properties that touch only corner to corner. <br />g. The property shall not abut I -35W or I -35E. <br />h. The storage area shall not abut a school or a public park. <br />i. The ratio of storage area to building footprint shall not exceed 3.5:1. <br />j. Storage shall not include material considered hazardous under Federal or State <br />Environmental Law. <br />The existing site does not meet the requirements listed in items a, b, c., and e above and cannot meet <br />the provisions of items f and g above. Jenmar Equity was notified that while they could apply for a <br />conditional use permit they could not satisfy the conditions of approval and therefore would not <br />likely be approved. <br />Lakes Building Components was notified of the zoning violation as well as potential building code <br />violations on March 3, 2011. The building code issues related to alteration of the exterior building <br />wall without a permit (a two foot high by sixteen foot wide slot was cut out of the exterior building <br />wall) and the change in occupancy of the building. The matter was turned over to the City Attorney <br />in April of 2011 after no attempts were made to bring the site into conformance. <br />On April 14, 2011 a letter from the City Attorney's office was sent to Jenmar Equity LLC notifying <br />them of the violations. Correspondence between the City Attorney and the owner's attorney has <br />been ongoing. To date only the building permit issue has been addressed. No movement has been <br />made on the exterior storage violation. On June 7, the City Attorney again informed Jenmar that the <br />materials must be stored inside or moved off site. The City's next course of action would be to cite <br />them for the ongoing violation and seek a court order to remedy the situation. <br />While attempts will be made to suggest this as an economic development issue it-is really a very <br />simple zoning matter. Jenmar Equities is leasing space in a building to a business that operates in a <br />manner not permitted for that property. Jenmar Equity, the property owner, has asked for the council <br />to consider allowing the use to continue. Neither city staff nor the city council has the authority to <br />grant that approval. To allow such a use in this location, on either an interim or permanent basis, the <br />City would need to amend the zoning ordinance. <br />When considering such a change the intent and purpose of the existing ordinance should be <br />reviewed. Additionally the use should be evaluated as to whether it meets that purpose or is <br />otherwise accommodated within the district or elsewhere in the city. <br />Section 8. Subdivision 1 of the LI, Light Industrial District states the following: <br />"These areas have the prerequisites for industrial development, but because of proximity to <br />residential areas or the need to protect certain areas or uses from adverse influences, high <br />development standards will be necessary..." <br />2 <br />