Laserfiche WebLink
• <br />• <br />• <br />CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION <br />DATE <br />TIME STARTED <br />TIME ENDED <br />MEMBERS PRESENT <br />MEMBERS ABSENT <br />DRAFT <br />CITY OF LINO LAKES <br />MINUTES <br />September 6, 2011 <br />: September 6, 2011 <br />. 5:30 p.m. <br />. 9:00 p.m. <br />: Council Member Gallup, O'Donnell, <br />Roeser and Mayor Reinert <br />: Council Member Rafferty <br />Staff members present: City Administrator Jeff Karlson, City Engineer JasonWedel, <br />Director of Finance Al Rolek, City Attorney Joseph Langel, Community Development <br />Director Michael Grochala, Public Services Director Rick DeGardner, Public Safety <br />Director John Swenson, City Clerk Julie Bartell <br />1. Fence at 1205 Buckthorn Lane — City Engineer Wedel explained that the owners of <br />the property at this address, Michael and Tracey Jansen, are interested in putting up a <br />fence around their property. They applied for a fence permit and a standard <br />encroachment agreement with that. When the application was reviewed by staff it was <br />determined that the property has certain easements that were included when the lot was <br />platted. The city has certain criteria related to the granting of encroachments and the <br />Jansen's request for a fence permit was administratively denied based on those criteria, <br />specifically the presence of underground utilities. Since the Jansen's are still interested in <br />pursuing a fence, staff did investigate the possibility of flexibility on placement however <br />that was not fruitful. They are currently requesting permission to construct a fence that <br />could be taken down at city request - a fence of a temporary nature. Staff is <br />recommending that a fence be installed only if it can meet city criteria. <br />Mr. Jensen told the council that he is considering not using cement posts but rather fence <br />post spikes instead; he has used them successfully in the past. They would be of a <br />temporary nature. He confirmed that there is not a homeowner covenant issue with the <br />fence. <br />When the mayor asked staff about the possibility of allowing a temporary structure, the <br />City engineer explained that it would be a deviation of what the city has required for <br />decades (encroachment criteria). Mr. Wedel also pointed out that there could be a <br />different owner down the line that wouldn't be in tune with a "special" agreement. <br />Community Development Director Grochala added that one concern in using the spikes is <br />that the underground pipes could actually be at different depths. When the mayor asked if <br />there are other cities allowing such temporary spikes, staff replied that they are not aware <br />of any. <br />The council discussed the issue of the corner of the property and the bike paths that meet <br />there; there is a visibility question also. <br />