My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
02-03-14 Council Packet
LinoLakes
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
1982-2020
>
2014
>
02-03-14 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/6/2014 2:46:56 PM
Creation date
1/31/2014 4:06:07 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Council Document Type
Council Packet
Meeting Date
02/03/2014
Council Meeting Type
Work Session Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
56
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />WS – Item # 6 <br /> <br />WORK SESSION STAFF REPORT <br />Work Session Item No. 6 <br /> <br />Date: February 3, 2014 <br /> <br />To: City Council <br /> <br />From: Michael Grochala <br /> <br />Re: Pavement Management Program Process <br /> <br />Background <br /> <br />The City Council reviewed three (3 ) pavement management f inancing options at the <br />January 6, 2014 work session. The options included: <br /> <br /> Pay for 100% of the improvements with special assessments. <br /> Pay for improvements with a combination of special assessments and property <br />taxes using Improvement Bonds . <br /> Pay for 100% of the improvements with property taxes using street reconstruction <br />bonds . <br /> <br />The first option was eliminated by staff due to the difficulty in just ifying assessments in <br />the amounts necessary to cover 100% of project costs. <br /> <br />The council requested additional information regarding the remaining options and <br />requested that staff begin development of a five year street reconstruction plan. <br /> <br />Options <br /> <br />The two primary funding sources for non -state aid street reconstruction are special <br />assessments to benefiting property owners and property ta xes. Base d on the past <br />discussion the council could proceed under the following options : <br /> <br />Option 1 : Pay for improvements with a combination of special assessments and <br />property taxes using Improvement Bonds . This option wil l require voter <br />approval unless the charter is amended to eliminate that requirement. <br /> <br />Accordingly t his option can be broken down into 2 subparts: <br /> <br />Option 1A: Proceed under current Charter Provisions <br /> <br />The pref e r red project would be selected following completion of the Five Year Street <br />Reconstruction Plan . Under the existing charter process we would need to in itiate the <br />feasib ility study by March and hold the required public hearing in June. A minimum of <br />20% of the total project cost would need to be assessed. If no petition against the pr oject
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.