Laserfiche WebLink
<br />these bonds, the City may include a tax levy to pay part of the <br />bond debt service. <br /> <br /> 4. The City may also asse ss a portion of the cost of an improvement, <br />and use those revenues in addition to utility revenues. The special <br />assessments are still subject to the petition and veto process under <br />the Charter, but the Charter would not require an election on the <br />project itself because costs would not be paid with a tax levy or <br />general city funds. <br /> <br /> 5. The City could combine utility bonds with improvement bonds or <br />street reconstruction bonds to finance various portions of a street <br />reconstruction project. For example, the City could finance just <br />the street work by issuing street reconstruction bonds paid entirely <br />with a tax levy (subject to reverse referendum), and finance the <br />utility work with utility bonds secured by net utility revenues. No <br />election is required unde r the Charter because no part of the project <br />is specially assessed —the Charter does not apply at all. <br /> <br /> Or, the City could specially assess 100% of the cost of the street <br />work, and use utility revenues to pay 100% of the cost of the utility <br />work. In tha t case, the City might issue improvement bonds for the <br />street portion and utility bonds for the utility portion. No election <br />is required under the Charter because, even though the street <br />project is assessed (so the Charter does apply to that work), no par t <br />of the project is paid from tax levy or general City funds. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />