My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
12/12/2011 Council Packet
LinoLakes
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
1982-2020
>
2011
>
12/12/2011 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/13/2014 2:25:08 PM
Creation date
2/3/2014 9:15:42 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Council Document Type
Council Packet
Meeting Date
12/12/2011
Council Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
91
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• <br />• <br />• <br />CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION <br />DRAFT <br />'P. 17i <br />December 5, 2011 <br />91 The Mayor reiterated that he does not support a one hauler concept for the city because it <br />92 reduces choice and competition. He is thinking more positively in the area of fringe <br />93 collections — recycling and yard waste services. He noted that the entire subject is merely <br />94 a topic of conversation at this point and it does merit that conversation. <br />95 <br />96 The council directed staff to bring the matter to the city's Environmental Board for their <br />97 review and recommendation. That discussion can include the idea of reducing regular <br />98 haulers to three but only through attrition. <br />99 <br />100 3. 2012 Environmental Board Goals — Environmental Coordinator Marty Asleson <br />101 introduced Environmental Board member Barbara Bor who reviewed the list of goals for <br />102 2012 (see staff report for complete list of goals). <br />103 <br />104 The Mayor suggested that the council get together with the Envirionmental Board for <br />105 some joint discussion, perhaps to hear about their recommendation on solid waste <br />106 collection. <br />107 <br />108 4. 35E Business Area Sign Plan Update — Community Development Director Grochala <br />109 reviewed a map of current signage. Staff is working with the city's engineering firm, <br />110 WSB, including their traffic engineers, on the idea of adding more signs and what would <br />111 be most effective. He noted the blue signs already in place that are business directed and <br />112 that are paid for by the businesses; increasing that exposure may be a good way to go. As <br />113 the city looks at increasing signage in the area, it may be an issue to allow signs in the <br />114 right of way since it could set a precedent for other areas. When a council member <br />115 mentioned a specific spot where it could seem that you are getting back onto the freeway <br />116 but you are not, City Engineer Wedel agreed that the signs for that situation are confusing <br />117 and need work. The Mayor noted that the optimum signage would be above roadway <br />118 with arrows — very clear and visible. Staff will continue their work. <br />119 <br />120 5. Advisory Board Appointments- City Clerk Bartell noted that openings on the city's <br />121 advisory board were advertised and applications received through the month of <br />122 November. The list of applicants was received by the council. Since there were not <br />123 enough applications received to fill current openings on the Planning and Zoning Board <br />124 and the Economic Development Advisory Commisttee, the council directed staff to <br />125 reopen the process. When the process is complete, the council will interview new <br />126 applicants or where there is competition for a position. <br />127 <br />128 6. Final Review of the 2012 Proposed Budget — Finance Director Rolek noted that the <br />129 council has received the final draft of the 2012 budget and it includes changes reflecting: <br />130 receipt of a Citizens Corp Program grant that increases the Police Department's <br />131 Commmunity Relations Coordinator position; final quotes for employee health coverage; <br />132 and a reduction in total expenditures in excess of $56,000. One question for the council <br />133 will be how do they wish to recognize that reduction. Possibilities are to put it into the <br />134 fund balance, increase the contingency or to lower the tax levy. <br />135 <br />3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.