Laserfiche WebLink
02 <br />, <br />Ord. 01 -02 <br />Attachment A <br />Page 1 <br />• <br />COUNCIL MEETING <br />MARCH 27, 1989 <br />the City will do this in the most effective manner. <br />Residents on Rustic Lane will not be assessed unless they . <br />decide to connect to the .serives. <br />Mr. Stahlberg said he would have further information for the <br />Council at the ApriI 10, 1989 meeting. Mr. Reinert asked Mr. <br />Stahlberg if, the alternate route appeared to be the most <br />expedient? Mr. Stahlberg said yes and it appears to best in <br />the long haul for Lino Lakes; It also is.most logical in <br />terms of availability in terms of maintenance. <br />PUBLIC HEARING - VARIANCE AND VACATION OF SOLE EASEMENTS -- <br />LOTS IN LAKES ADDITION NO. 3, AOGER•NELSON.• • <br />Mayor Benson opened the public hearing at 7:47 P.M. Mr. <br />Miller explained the background of this request. The City <br />has attempted to sell fourteen lots on Black Duck Drive to <br />Mr. Nelson_ These lots were tax forfeit and were purchased <br />by the City for resale to recoup some of the assessments- <br />Mr. Nelson was the successful bidder on the lots and he is in <br />the process of obtaining all the necessary permits to build <br />on some of the lots. Mr. Miller pointed to a map behind the <br />Council which indicates the setback variances needed and <br />easement vacations needed to make the lots buildable_ If <br />setback variances are granted, Mr. Nelson will be able to <br />build house twenty nine feet from the road surface. <br />The P & Z Board has recommended denial of the variances. <br />However due to the litigation currently surrounding these <br />lots Mr. Miller suggested that the Council re- examine the <br />issue. <br />Mr. Reinert noted that at one time the Council was told that <br />tb.ese lots were not acceptable because of environmental <br />reasons and asked what has changed to make them more <br />suitable. Mr. Schumacher explained that the City does have <br />documentation indicating that several of the lots. are . <br />buildable. He also noted that this request is before the <br />Council so that the lawsuit .regarding the lots can be <br />settled. Mr. Hawkins gave a brief explanation of the lawsuit <br />and suggested that since this matter is in litigation, the <br />Council meet, in closed session ' either 'ziow or at a latter date <br />to discuss the matter•. Mr. Reinert said he was concerned <br />that we do not get ourselves or 'future buyers into trouble <br />with possible flooding. <br />Mr. Neal noted that barrow material for filling these lots is <br />proposed to be taken from Outlot F. He explained that <br />residents around Outlot F have been maintaining this property <br />and have been told that.in the future they'may have the <br />opportunity to purchase portions of the Outlot and add to <br />their lots_ <br />• the'Council recessed to a closed meeting to discuss this <br />