My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
02/11/2002 Council Packet
LinoLakes
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
1982-2020
>
2002
>
02/11/2002 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/11/2014 3:15:39 PM
Creation date
2/3/2014 12:06:21 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Council Document Type
Council Packet
Meeting Date
02/11/2002
Council Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
151
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• <br />• <br />Figure 1. Location of great blue heron and <br />great egret rookeries where feeding habitat <br />data were collected in 1998. <br />2 <br />clockwise direction, approximately 300 meters <br />above the ground, and a bird selected as it left the <br />rookery. That bird was then followed to its <br />feeding location (Custer and Osborn 1978, Custer <br />and Bunck 1992). The time of day that the bird <br />left the rookery and the time it arrived at its <br />feeding location were recorded. The location <br />where the bird landed was mapped using a <br />combination of global position system equipment <br />and/or landmarks. The general habitat <br />characteristics (small pond, lake, river, main <br />channel of UMR, open water, emergent <br />vegetation, submergent vegetation, forest, urban, <br />agricultural, etc.), surface water characteristics <br />(glass -like, rippled, or rough), and the presence of <br />other herons and egrets was quantified. After those data were recorded, the observer returned to <br />the nesting rookery and repeated the flight following with a different bird. The next bird to follow <br />was chosen by beginning the search for a new bird at the location in the rookery where the <br />previous bird had departed from and then continuing to fly around the rookery in a counter- <br />clockwise direction. The next bird to leave the rookery was then followed. This eliminated any <br />bias in choosing which bird to follow and ensured that all directions from the rookery had an <br />equal chance of being selected. As many birds as possible were followed from each rookery <br />during a 2- to 3 -hr period in the morning and a 2- to 3 -hr period in the afternoon. Only one <br />species was followed during a specific time period (i.e. either morning or afternoon) and the <br />species followed during a specific time period was alternated so that each species was followed <br />both in the morning and afternoon. The time -of -day that a flight was made, however, was <br />probably unimportant because great blue herons feed steadily throughout the day (McNeil et al. <br />1993). <br />Results and Discussion <br />One hundred eighty -nine great blue herons and 86 great egrets were followed from 4 <br />rookeries, Pigs Eye, Vermillion River, Peltier Lake, and Smith Slough, between April and July <br />1998. The Vermillion River and Pigs Eye rookeries were only flown twice. Excessive air traffic <br />in the vicinity of Pigs Eye rookery made those flights dangerous and reduced the quality of the <br />data to the point that it would have been virtually useless. The Vermillion River rookery was <br />discontinued because it lacked great egrets. Peltier Lake and Smith Slough rookeries were <br />substituted at that time. The numbers of birds followed and the distribution of flights covered the <br />breeding season (Custer et al. 1996, Table 1). Observations were terminated at the Pigs Eye <br />rookery before the great egrets arrived there in numbers, and no great egrets were present in the <br />Vermillion River rookery. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.