My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
02/11/2002 Council Packet
LinoLakes
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
1982-2020
>
2002
>
02/11/2002 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/11/2014 3:15:39 PM
Creation date
2/3/2014 12:06:21 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Council Document Type
Council Packet
Meeting Date
02/11/2002
Council Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
151
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• <br />6 <br />The time required and distance traveled to reach a feeding site were correlated, but each <br />metric provides slightly different information (Fig. 2 - 11). The time spent is most useful in <br />determining energetic costs, whereas, distance is more useful in quantifying various habitat <br />parameters. The maximum distance traveled to a feeding site was between 26 and 43 km (Fig. 7 - <br />11). The mode was always less than 1 km in all cases. The median distance traveled was similar <br />between great blue herons and great egrets at Smith Slough, 7.4 and 7.0 km, but was different <br />between the species at Peltier Lake. At Peltier Lake, great blue herons traveled a median distance <br />of 2.7 km compared to 11.8 km for great egrets. The median distance would be even greater at <br />Peltier Lake, 115 km, if the 6 great egrets that flew to a roost site on the shore of Peltier Lake <br />were disregarded. The reason for this difference in distance flown between great blue herons and <br />great egrets may be accounted for by the habitat preference noted above in Table 2. The rookery <br />is located on an island in Peltier Lake, which is 1 of several large lakes in the area. There are few <br />small ponds or marshes in the immediate vicinity of the rookery, hence the great egrets had to fly <br />farther to find preferable feeding habitat than did the great blue herons. The median distance <br />flown to feeding sites at tie _V rmillion River rookery was smaller than at the other rookeries, <br />however, because only nights were made. The median distance would have been greater had <br />more flights been made.A <br />The spatial distribution of heron and egret feeding sites varied:by_rookery location (Figs. <br />° 12 - 17). The Peltier Lake birds flew fairly uniformly out in all directions from the rookery (Fig. <br />12 - 13). The Mississippi River rookeries, Smith Slough (Fig. 14 - 15), Vermillion River (Fig. <br />. 16), and Pigs Eye (Fig. 17), however, had feeding flight lines constrained by the course of the <br />upper Mississippi River. The birds that were lost en route, square yellow boxes on figures 12 - <br />17, were lost for several reasons. Those at Pigs Eye were lost mainly because of interference with <br />other airplanes or lack of access to restricted air space. At the other rookeries, however, losses <br />were mainly do to the difficulty of following birds that began to circle and gain altitude rapidly. <br />These were often the birds that were leaving the Mississippi River to go inland to feed. They <br />apparently found that it was energetically beneficial to gain altitude by riding thermals and then to <br />coast to distant feeding sites. <br />The distance flown, time to fly to feeding sites, and feeding habitat characteristics at <br />Vermillion River and Smith Slough rookeries were similar to other rookeries on the upper <br />Mississippi River that the author has worked during the past 3 years. Herons and egrets utilize <br />shallow water, braided channel habitat near their rookery, with some off -river feeding. The use of <br />off river feeding habitat is dependent on water levels on the upper Mississippi River for both <br />species. Water level on the upper Mississippi River seems to be more important for great egrets <br />than for great blue herons, however. When the river stage is high, especially in the spring, many <br />to most great egrets may leave the upper Mississippi River to feed because there is little shallow <br />water within the flood plain. As noted above, great egrets land in water and then proceed to feed. <br />They seem to rarely feed from perches such as logs and rocks. Great blue herons, on the other <br />hand, will feed from perches, so they can use deeper water habitats and hence still feed on the <br />upper Mississippi River even during higher water levels. In 1998, the water levels on the upper <br />Mississippi River were generally lower than normal; the spring floods were of less magnitude. <br />IP Because of this, there was more on -river feeding by Smith Slough herons and egrets than has been <br />seen at other rookeries in other years. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.