My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
02/11/2002 Council Packet
LinoLakes
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
1982-2020
>
2002
>
02/11/2002 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/11/2014 3:15:39 PM
Creation date
2/3/2014 12:06:21 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Council Document Type
Council Packet
Meeting Date
02/11/2002
Council Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
151
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA <br />eirbi- it- <br />January 23, 2002 <br />Joan Galli <br />Non -Game Wildlife Specialist <br />1200 Warner Road <br />St. Paul, MN 55106 <br />Dear Joan, <br />James Ford Bell Museum of Natural History 10 Church Street S.E. <br />Minneapolis, MN 55455 -0104 <br />612- 624 -7083 <br />Fax: 612 - 626 -7704 <br />College of Natural Resources <br />Thank you for inviting me to today's meeting. I'm sorry that I had to leave before <br />the meeting concluded but I had a meeting back on campus for which I couldn't be late. <br />Perhaps you will find the following hasty summary of my thoughts after the meeting <br />helpful in thinking about next steps. <br />We spent a great deal of time talking about water skiing but I think we would be <br />wise to keep other possible explanations in mind. The following are nine alternatives, <br />presented in alphabetic order, and my assessment of the likelihood that each is the <br />primary cause of abandonment. Importantly, I've suggested steps that could be taken to <br />either eliminate each potential cause or at least to obtain data that would help us to <br />determine whether each alternative might be contributing to the heron/egret <br />abandonment. To maximize the probability of successfully maintaining this colony now, <br />and to maximize our ability to prevent colony abandonment in the future, we should <br />seriously consider all of these possibilities. <br />It is likely that someone will suggest that there is insufficient evidence to identify <br />the primary cause of abandonment and that no restriction on lake use should be imposed <br />until such time as we have conclusive data. I would suggest that we used that philosophy <br />in 2001 with the result that once again there was no successful breeding in this colony. <br />Given the status of this colony as one of the largest, of a relatively small number of metro <br />area colonies, this is a matter of great concern for the entire north metro area. For the <br />health of the metro area ecosystem we cannot afford to wait another year for all the <br />necessary data to be obtained before we act. We must make an educated guess and take <br />action. <br />In my opinion, the most likely explanation is that the colony has been abandoned <br />due to direct human influence in the form of human disturbance (noise and physical <br />presence) in close proximity to the colony. We should work with the community to <br />encourage the adoption of a no -wake zone north of the bog poles. <br />Respect <br />1y, <br />I <br />M. Lanyon, Ph.D. <br />i ector, Bell Museum of Natural History <br />Professor, Dept. of Ecology, Evolution, and <br />Behavior <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.