My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
02/11/2002 Council Packet
LinoLakes
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
1982-2020
>
2002
>
02/11/2002 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/11/2014 3:15:39 PM
Creation date
2/3/2014 12:06:21 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Council Document Type
Council Packet
Meeting Date
02/11/2002
Council Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
151
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• HYPOTHESIS #6 Inadequate quantity and/or quality of nesting material <br />ASSESSMENT — It appears likely that this could be a limiting resource for the <br />colony. If nest material is in short supply, herons and egrets may be forced to <br />select materials of lower quality. Nests built with low quality materials may be <br />more prone to destruction_. However, it is hard for me to imagine circumstances <br />under which this would lead to a mass abandonment of a colony. <br />ACTION PLAN — Augment the environment with appropriate nest construction <br />materials early in the season (April) and document whether, and to what extent, <br />the herons and egrets make use of this resource. <br />HYPOTHESIS #7 Noise Disturbance — 35W construction <br />ASSESSMENT — It remains possible that the noise associated with this <br />construction project was partially or even completely responsible for the <br />abandonment of the colony in 2000. However, it clearly cannot be the primary <br />cause of abandonment in 2001. <br />ACTION PLAN —Inform the Minnesota Department of Transportation and <br />other offices of the location of concentrations of sensitive wildlife (e.g., colonial <br />waterbird breeding colonies) and provide advice regarding steps they could take <br />to minimize disturbance to the colony (most notably avoiding construction during <br />the time when birds have eggs and nestlings). <br />HYPOTHESIS #8 Noise Disturbance — motor boats close to the island <br />ASSESSMENT —/t appears likely that this could result in sufficient disturbance <br />to cause a mass abandonment of this colony although we lack information on the <br />• timing and intensity of this activity. <br />ACTION PLAN — Maintain a no -wake zone north of the bog poles. Have a <br />discussion with the community asking them to restrict their high speed activities <br />to the area south of the bog poles. We should also post the community decision, <br />to maintain a no wake zone north of the bog poles, on the poles themselves to <br />ensure that visitors to the lake are aware of this goal. <br />HYPOTHESIS #9 Weather <br />ASSESSMENT —A violent storm that destroys nests is often the cause of mass <br />abandonment in colonies. However, there is no evidence of such a storm and/or <br />of mass nest destruction in this colony in 2000 and 2001. <br />ACTION PLAN —Monitor nesting status at regular intervals during the <br />breeding season and immediately following any storms that are accompanied by <br />with significant wind speeds. <br />• <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.