My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
02/11/2002 Council Packet
LinoLakes
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
1982-2020
>
2002
>
02/11/2002 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/11/2014 3:15:39 PM
Creation date
2/3/2014 12:06:21 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Council Document Type
Council Packet
Meeting Date
02/11/2002
Council Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
151
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
r <br />• <br />COUNCIL MINUTES JANUARY 14, 2002 <br />Connie Grundhofer, 235 Linda Avenue, stated the City has worked hard on its new Comprehensive <br />Plan and in order to implement the new Plan, the City must develop new ordinances. She believed <br />this process will take some time and the sooner the process can begin the better. For this reason she <br />asked that the proposed moratorium be passed. <br />Matthew Weiland, representing Mr. and Mrs. Cardinal, stated the Cardinals have been working on the <br />development of their property and submitted a plat application today. He felt because this application <br />was in process it should be exempted from the impending moratorium. He indicated the applicants <br />wished to continue working with the City on these development plans. <br />Mr. Coyle indicated late this afternoon he faxed a letter to the City documenting the issues he wished <br />to discuss this evening. He indicated Mr. Uhde was in attendance this evening, as well as his <br />engineering consultant, John Johnson. <br />Mr. Coyle stated he had previously expressed opposition to the proposed moratorium and his <br />opposition remains the same. He felt the moratorium as proposed was unfair and illegal and the <br />intent of the moratorium to establish growth control measures; which would allow the issuance of <br />only 147 single - family building permits per year, which he believed was arbitrary and not legally <br />sustainable. <br />Mr. Coyle stated as of last Wednesday, Mr. Uhde has submitted a preliminary plat application for the <br />next phase of the Behm's development. He stated Mr, lJhde would like to see that application <br />processed by City staff. He stated if the City Council is determined to proceed with the moratorium, <br />Mr. Uhde would request that a portion of the-land within the proposed project be exempted from the <br />terms of the moratorium. He stated Mr. ma-- e -would like the ability to proceed with 23 acres of the <br />approximately 98 acres Behm's Development Addition, while City staff is the process of working <br />through the zoning and subdivision ordinance changes that are the subject of the moratorium decision. <br />Mr. Coyle indicated, by applying the language of the moratorium ordinance literally, he felt that any <br />land currently zoned R -1 or which is covered by an approved preliminary plat is exempted from the <br />moratorium. With respect to the project area, a total of 9.387 acres meets this definition and should <br />be allowed to go forward. Outlots B, C and D, Behm's Development 5th Addition, are already zoned <br />R -1. Additionally, Lots 13, 14, 15 and 16 of Sunset Oaks (to be replatted with the Behm's <br />Development) are covered by an approved preliminary plat. <br />Mr. Coyle indicated Mr. Uhde further requests that an additional 13.861 acres be exempted from the <br />moratorium due to its compatibility with the underlying nine acres, and its compatibility with the <br />existing, approved and fully developed Behm's development. <br />Mr. Coyle stated if these requests are granted, Mr. Uhde would be committed to working with City <br />staff to ensure the project conforms with the existing ordinances and that in the future the balance of <br />the property not being proposed at this time will conform with whatever form the ordinances may <br />take. <br />10 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.