Laserfiche WebLink
• <br />COUNCIL MINUTES JANUARY 14, 2002 <br />City Planner Smyser felt that this would eliminate a number of purposes of the proposed ordinance. <br />He indicated allowing the recently received plats to be exempted from the ordinance would distract <br />staff from efficiently working on the necessary ordinances to implement the Comprehensive Plan. <br />Additionally, the current ordinances will not implement the new Comprehensive Plan and, in order to <br />do so, staff must revise the official controls. Therefore, he believed staff's view would be that <br />exempting these plat applications would be defeating the purpose of the moratorium. He noted many <br />other developers had recently questioned whether they should submit preliminary plat applications <br />and were told, while they could summit their applications, their plats would not receive approval prior <br />to the effective date of the moratorium. He felt it would be unfair to those developers to allow the <br />recently submitted plats to be exempt from the moratorium. <br />Mayor Bergeson noted over the next couple of years there will be a number of new homes constructed <br />within the City, some under the old rules and some under the new rules. He felt it will take at least <br />one to two years before all new construction will be under the new rules. He felt the issue at hand <br />was interpreting where the old rules end and where the new ones begin. <br />Councilmember Carlson suggested that the Council address the concern that there is currently not <br />enough housing inventory in the City. City Planner Shyser believed Mr. Robinson was referring to <br />the goal of the new Comprehensive Plan to maintain 4n inventory of three years at approximately 147 <br />new lots per year. He indicated the City currently has approximately 400 lots in inventory at this <br />time. He noted in order to implement this goal, controls must be in place. He noted one primary <br />reason for the moratorium was the concern over wheher or not the new Comprehensive Plan is in <br />effect and can be used as a guide. He believed the Ci 'currently has enough inventory for nearly <br />three years of residential development an d the new ordinances will be in effect well before that time. <br />Councilmember Carlson asked whether the Council would have any basis to allow the applications <br />received prior to this evening to rove forward. She no t Mr. Vaughn's development project was <br />also under consideration at this time, having been reviewed by the Planning and Zoning Board at their <br />last meeting. However, she stated there may be difficulty if other developers feel they did not have <br />this opportunity. <br />Community Development Director Grochala clarified that staff did not tell any developers to not <br />make application at this time; rather they had been informed of the process, the proposed moratorium <br />and its purpose. <br />Community Development Director Grochala stated he could foresee problems with pursuing the <br />exemption of the recently submitted plat applications. He questioned whether the City Council would <br />be willing to approve two plats consisting of approximately 260 lots for development based on the <br />existing rules. He indicated if the plats were consistent with the existing rules, Staff would have no <br />basis to recommend denial. Additionally, the City does not have MUSA available at this time to <br />allocate to the two subject plats. <br />Community Development Director Grochala stated the City has worked a number of years on the new <br />Comprehensive Plan and the 20 -20 vision process and a new Plan has been developed. He stated <br />13 <br />