My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
03/25/2002 Council Packet
LinoLakes
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
1982-2020
>
2002
>
03/25/2002 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/11/2014 2:55:14 PM
Creation date
2/4/2014 9:36:29 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Council Document Type
Council Packet
Meeting Date
03/25/2002
Council Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
56
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• AGENDA ITEM 7 C <br />• <br />• <br />STAFF ORIGINATOR: Jeff Smyser <br />C. C. MEETING DATE: March 25, 2002 <br />TOPIC: Resolution 02 -21, Requiring Preparation Of An <br />Environmental Assessment Worksheet for <br />Pheasant Hills Preserve 12th Addition <br />ACTION REQUIRED: 3/5 vote <br />BACKGROUND <br />The City received a petition requesting the preparation of an Environmental Assessment <br />Worksheet (EAW) for the Pheasant Hills 12th Addition project. The petition requests that the <br />Minnesota Environmental Quality Board (EQB) act as the responsible governmental unit for the <br />EAW. In accordance with the rules, the EQB decides which governmental unit has the greatest <br />responsibility for supervising or approving the project as a whole. In this case, it is the City of <br />Lino Lakes, and so the EQB forwarded the petition to us. <br />The project may not be started and no final governmental decision can be made on the project <br />until the EAW process is completed. The project proposer, Mr. Ed Vaughan, has been notified <br />that no further work is to occur on the site. <br />Under the rules, the City <br />shall order the preparation of an EAW if the evidence presented by the petitioners, <br />proposers, and other persons or otherwise known to the (City) demonstrates that, because <br />of the nature or location of the proposed project, the project may have the potential for <br />significant environmental effects. The (City) shall deny the petition if the evidence <br />presented fails to demonstrate the project may have the potential for significant <br />environmental effects. MN Rules 4410.11 Subp. 6 <br />The site is within a shoreland overlay district. This requires extra scrutiny of possible effects on <br />the natural environment. The project would require extensive clearing of vegetation, including <br />trees, for the road, for house pads, and for stormwater ponds. The 300' bridge will require <br />several piers constructed on land or in the water. The construction of the bridge, and the project <br />in general, creates the potential for significant impacts to land and water, including the wetlands, <br />vegetation, and the existing neighborhood of Quail Ridge. <br />Because of the potential impacts, it is appropriate to prepare an EAW. The attached Resolution <br />02 -21 includes findings of fact supporting the decision to require the preparation of an EAW. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.