Laserfiche WebLink
• <br />• <br />site, and incomplete information needed to process the plat. Note: All information <br />required has been submitted by the developer. They also submitted recommendations to <br />consider if the proposal is approved. These comments are attached and, where <br />applicable, have been incorporated in this report. <br />Planning and Zoning Board <br />The Planning and Zoning Board held a public hearing and reviewed the proposal at its <br />July 10, 2002 regular meeting. The Board recommended approval of the Rezoning and <br />Preliminary Plat with the conditions included in the staff recommendation. <br />The Board also recommended approval of the MUSA allocation with the following <br />conditions: <br />a. Allocation of MUSA shall be subject to the approval of the City's 2001 <br />Comprehensive Plan by the Metropolitan Council. <br />b. That the City demonstrates the need, consistent with the Comprehensive <br />Plan, for the growth population numbers of 3.47 people per home, <br />including the census data of homes built from 2000 to current, as well as <br />what's included in already approved homes for the lot inventory. <br />RECOMMENDATION <br />Based on the findings contained in this report and subject to the conditions listed below, <br />staff recommends the following: <br />A. Approval of the MUSA Allocation subject to the following conditions: <br />1. The development shall be accordance with the approved phasing plan <br />consisting of 52 lots in 2002 and the remaining lots in 2003. <br />B. Approval of the Rezoning from R, Rural District to R -1X, Single Family <br />Executive District subject to the following conditions: <br />1. The Rezoning shall not be effective until 30 days following publication of <br />the ordinance. <br />C. Approval of the Preliminary Plat subject to the following conditions: <br />1. The MUSA Allocation and Rezoning are approved. <br />2. A revised preliminary plat shall be submitted containing the following <br />modifications: <br />a. The alignment of Street B shall be modified to reduce potential <br />• wetland impacts from its easterly extension, subject to staff review. <br />Stoneybrook Page 10 <br />