My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
02/28/2000 Council Packet
LinoLakes
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
1982-2020
>
2000
>
02/28/2000 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/11/2014 4:54:29 PM
Creation date
2/11/2014 9:11:48 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Council Document Type
Council Packet
Meeting Date
02/28/2000
Council Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
122
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Planning & Zoning Board <br />February 9, 2000 <br />Page 8 <br />be appropriate for this lake. He advised of the education that has been occurring <br />regarding the damage caused by fertilizers and progress made in that regard. Chair Schaps <br />stated this is a recreational lake and he does not believe this condition would be fair to <br />impose on the applicant. <br />Mr. Corson suggested that during the construction period they be required to place silt <br />fence to eliminate sedimentation into the lake. Mr. Vanderlik stated they would not <br />object but do intend to start construction shortly so there may be some problem with <br />installing silt fence posts into the frozen ground. He stated it is their intent to leave the <br />surrounding ground natural but it is the property owner's decision with regard to what <br />happens to the groundcover after construction. He noted that this land has very little <br />slope. <br />Mr. Corson noted that the erosion control could be installed in the newly placed fill which <br />would not be frozen. <br />Chair S chaps suggested the applicant talk with several of the neighbors regarding the high <br />water level. <br />Ms. Lane noted the comment from the DNR sa <br />setback being maximized and placing the veg <br />the DNR approved the City's Shoreline 0 � inan <br />grant the variance. He advised that staff <br />Boardmember's comments regardin <br />they of object subject to the lake <br />uffer. Mr. Smyser explained that <br />t the City does have the authority to <br />a supplemental report to convey the <br />to the City Council. <br />Ms. Lane made a MOTION to ap <br />single - family home at 6750 <br />High Water Level of Resha <br />conditions: <br />ariance request to allow construction of a <br />Lake Drive within 100 feet of the Ordinary <br />ased on findings as indicated and on the following <br />1. The home is constructed at the 30 -foot front setback line with a varied lake <br />setback of 71 feet to 84 feet. <br />2. A revised survey document is provided for building permit purposes. <br />The MOTION was supported by Mr. Johnson. Motion carried 6 -0. <br />This item will go before the City Council Monday, February 14, 2000, 6:30 p.m. <br />E. Anoka County Parks, Beach Improvements, Centerville Lake <br />Staff stated the application from Anoka County Parks is for a Site and Building Plan <br />Review for four structures on the west side of Centerville Lake which is within the Rice <br />Creek Chain of Lakes Regional Park Reserve. The Park is zoned PSP, Public Semi - <br />Public. Public parks and recreational facilities as well as all public county government <br />• <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.