06/26/2000 Council Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Search

'ENVIRONMENTAL BOARD MEETING MARCH 29, 2000 Tschida Convenience Store and the applicant is Don Rolf of Archnet, Inc. The proposed lot area is 29,223 square feet and the required "green area" is 30% or 8,767 square feet. The proposal indicates 37% green area or 10,945 square feet. Surface water for the Dairy Queen will be diverted via storm sewer pipe to a proposed ponding area adjacent to Rice Creek. There are no zone - one /zone two areas on the site. There are no significant ecological delineations on the site. Soils are classified as BD (moderate infiltration rate [drained] / high runoff potential [undrained]) and B (moderate infiltration rate). The LW soil classification to the south is a loamy soil type. Site elevations gradually slope to Clearwater Creek. Davidson asked if the revised landscape plan has been submitted. Asleson stated it has not and that could be placed as a condition of approval, if desired. Wessell noted this project will be considered by the Planning Cot S ion on April 12, 2000 and the City Council on May 8, 2000 so it is not possible o dela onsideration. He suggested that a contingency approval be considered, if de • e s... Asleson presented the proposed ponding plan for th• , -de the freeway and explained how drainage will be accommodated. CA: Ho 4` g i asked how the water will get from one pond to the next. Asleson ex necttheree culverts in place and advised that something similar in nature is beingp` O'9 ® d for the Dairy Queen site. Donlin stated she would like a more cle ( explan ion of the drainage pattern. Asleson advised that the Watershed Distric _ °id r w aid approve the proposed drainage for the Dairy Queen site. Donlin stated her concern advised that the Dairy stated her support f re due to the intensity of lighting. Lessard opose to use shoebox lighting in the parking lot. Donlin hoebox lighting. Lanyon concurred. Davidson mov_ • to app the revised Dairy Queen site plan subject to the applicant's continued wor t» on the landscape plan and lighting plan and subject to input from City staff . t other groups as applicable. Lanyon seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. CITIZEN COMMENTS No citizens were present for comment. Wessell noted the presence of Julie Farnum who is present to address item 5F. Chair Houchins asked that item 5F be considered next. The Commission agreed.